Eur J Orthop Surg Tr
-
Eur J Orthop Surg Tr · Jul 2014
Review Meta Analysis Comparative StudyAdjacent segment degeneration and disease after lumbar fusion compared with motion-preserving procedures: a meta-analysis.
The purpose of our study was to compare lumbar fusion and motion-preserving procedures to determine whether lumbar fusion may be associated with a higher prevalence of adjacent segment degeneration (ASDeg) or adjacent segment disease (ASDis). ⋯ The current evidence suggests that lumbar fusion may result in a higher prevalence of adjacent segment degeneration or disease than motion-preserving procedures.
-
Eur J Orthop Surg Tr · Jul 2014
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Observational StudyPosition of polyaxial versus monoaxial screws in locked plating for proximal humeral fractures: analysis of a prospective randomized study.
-
Eur J Orthop Surg Tr · Jul 2014
ReviewComplex osteotomies vertebral column resection and decancellation.
Pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) is nowadays widely used to treat sagittal imbalance. Some complex malalignment cases cannot be treated by a PSO, whereas the imbalance is coronal or mixed or the sagittal imbalance is major and cannot be treated by a single PSO. The aim of this article was to review these complex situations--coronal imbalance, mixed imbalance, two-level PSO, vertebral column resection, and vertebral column decancellation, and to focus on their specificities. It wills also to evoke the utility of navigation in these complex cases.
-
Spinal osteotomies are used to treat partially flexible and fixed deformities. Fixed thoracic spinal deformities have been traditionally treated with anterior release and posterior correction with fusion. In recent decades, it has been shown that posterior-only osteotomies might be sufficient to achieve proper deformity correction with lower complication rates than with combined anterior and posterior procedures. ⋯ They can also be performed in the thoracic spine in the setting of rigid thoracic deformity. A progressive increase in complications has been reported with more aggressive osteotomies. The aim of this article was to describe the most common posterior spinal osteotomies used to treat adult thoracic spinal deformities, with special emphasis on the technical aspects, complications and outcomes, based on current publications and European Spine Study Group (ESSG) data.
-
Eur J Orthop Surg Tr · Jul 2014
Randomized Controlled TrialStudy protocol: trial of inflation osteoplasty in the management of tibial plateau fractures.
Restoration of articular congruency is a key factor in preventing post-traumatic osteoarthritis following tibial plateau fractures. Current surgical techniques using a bone tamp carry the risk of joint perforation and comminution of the depressed fragments which affect patient outcome. Successful use of inflation osteoplasty has been reported in both in vitro studies (Broome et al. in J Orthopaed Traumatol 13(2):89-95, 2012; Mauffrey et al. in Patient Saf Surg 6:6, 2012) and case reports in the management of fractures of the calcaneus, cuboid, distal radius, tibial plateau and acetabulum (Gupta et al. in Foot Ankle Int 32(2):205-210, 2011; Heim et al. in Foot Ankle Int 29(11):1154-1157, 2008; Konig et al. in Case Rep Unfallchirurg 109(4):328-331, 2006; Reiley in J Orthop Trauma 17:141-163, 2006). The aim of our study is to assess whether the use of the balloon osteoplasty improves the quality of reduction of a depressed tibial plateau fracture when compared to traditional methods of fracture reduction. ⋯ This is a single-centred randomised trial. We will recruit 24 adult patients admitted with either a depressed or split depressed tibial plateau fracture (medial or lateral) requiring surgical intervention. Consenting patients will be randomly allocated to the two treatment groups. Patients with concomitant injuries influencing the management of the tibial plateau fracture will be excluded from our study. The primary outcome measure is the quality of reduction based on the post-operative CT scan. Secondary outcome measures will be any surgical complication and patient satisfaction, measured using the Oxford Knee score and SF12 questionnaire at 3, 6 and 12 months. Principal analysis will be for the success of fracture reduction from the two techniques and the effect the operative technique had on patient satisfaction and the prevalence of surgical complications.