World Neurosurg
-
Case Reports
Endoscopic Transnasal Transclival Resection of Endodermal CYST of the Ventral Brainstem: Case Report.
Endodermal cysts are a rare pathology of the central nervous system located mostly in the upper thoracic or cervical regions. Seldomly, the cysts are found intracranially, most often in the subtentorial area (on the ventral surface of the brainstem, pontocerebellar angle, and fourth ventricle). Traditional approaches to the ventral surface of the brainstem are complicated and traumatic, and they do not provide a good view of the tumor's central and contralateral parts. In this case report, we present an alternative approach for resection of the endodermal cyst on the ventral surface of the brainstem. ⋯ The main advantage of the transclival transnasal approach is the direct access to the clivus and ventral surface of the brainstem without traction of the cerebral structures. If the transsphenoidal transclival approach is used, the cranial nerves are out of the approach area that minimizes the risk to damage it. An extended transsphenoidal transclival endonasal endoscopic approach is an alternative to traditional microsurgical approaches to pathologic processes on the ventral surface of the brainstem (cavernomas, endodermal cysts), located centrally.
-
National databases are used with increasing frequency in spine surgery literature to evaluate patient outcomes. The differences between individual databases in relationship to outcomes of lumbar fusion are not known. We evaluated the variability in standard outcomes of posterior lumbar fusion between the University HealthSystem Consortium (UHC) database and the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project National Inpatient Sample (NIS). ⋯ NIS and UHC databases had similar demographic patient populations undergoing posterior lumbar fusion. However, the UHC database reported significantly higher complication rate and longer LOS. This difference may reflect academic institutions treating higher-risk patients; however, a definitive reason for the variability between databases is unknown. The inability to precisely determine the basis of the variability between databases highlights the limitations of using administrative databases for spinal outcome analysis.
-
Spinal deformities that require ≥5 fusion levels are difficult and challenging for both the surgeon and patient. Corrections of moderate to severe deformities have been shown to improve patient-reported outcomes (PROs), and provide patients with a better quality of life. Self-image is an important PRO because it sheds insight into the patient's perception of health, as well as serving as a proxy of satisfaction for patients with spine deformity undergoing corrective surgery. However, with an aging population, the impact of age on long-term change in self-image is unknown. The aim of this study is to determine the effects of age on self-image 5 years after undergoing an elective complex spinal fusion (≥5 levels). ⋯ Our study suggests that age significantly affects the perception of self-image after deformity correction surgery; with younger patients reporting a greater change from baseline in self-image after surgery. Further studies are necessary to corroborate our observed findings.
-
The surgical technique of orbitozygomatic craniotomy reported by Zabramski et al. is an excellent procedure, facilitating wide surgical exposure, easy orbital reconstruction, and a satisfactory postsurgical aesthetic outcome; however, it is anatomically complicated and technically difficult. We introduce a simplified technique of Zabramski's orbitozygomatic craniotomy and present the anatomic and clinical findings with cadaveric photos, illustrations, and a video. ⋯ With this modified technique, Zabramski's ideal orbitozygomatic craniotomy could be achieved easily with only minimal complications, while realizing all advantages of the technique.
-
To compare the extent of persistent neuropsychological impairment in patients with complicated mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) and those with uncomplicated mTBI. ⋯ Our findings suggest that despite the broad umbrella designation of mTBI, the current classification schemes of injury severity for mild neurotrauma should be revisited. They also raise questions about the clinical relevance of both traumatic focal lesions and the absence of visible traumatic lesions on brain imaging studies in patients with milder forms of head trauma.