World Neurosurg
-
Review Case Reports
Spontaneous cranial bone regeneration after a craniectomy in an adult.
Spontaneous reossification is a very rare phenomenon following a large calvarial defect, particularly in adults. A 29-year-old woman with acute subdural hematoma and brain edema underwent emergent decompressive craniectomy and evacuation of hematoma. Follow-up examination 2 years later showed a well-formed bone along the craniectomy site. ⋯ A literature review is provided, and the physiology of the process is suggested. Pericranium, diploë, and, above all, dura mater collaborate in spontaneous bone formation. All these layers are very important, and they must be respected during dissection.
-
Glioma and meningioma are the most common primary brain tumors in adults. Epidemiologic studies of the relationship between female hormone exposure and exogenous hormone use and the risk of meningioma and glioma in females have yielded inconsistent results. ⋯ OC use may not increase the risks of glioma and meningioma in females. Instead, the long-term use of OCs may significantly decrease the risk of glioma, and the benefits are even more pronounced when the time window is >7.5 years. Nonetheless, the pooled results in this study suggest that OC use may not increase the risk of meningioma. Therefore, our conclusion should be validated and supplemented in future larger studies.
-
Brain metastases from endometrial cancer are rare and poorly described. We aimed to estimate the proportion of brain metastases at our institution that arose from endometrial cancer, and to detail clinicopathologic features and survival outcomes. ⋯ We describe the largest cohort to date of patients with brain metastases originating from endometrial cancer. These patients represent a small fraction of all patients with brain metastases and have poor prognoses. These data enable providers caring for patients with brain metastases from endometrial cancer to appropriately counsel their patients.
-
Lesioning the Forel field or the subthalamic region is considered a possible treatment for tremoric patients with Parkinson disease, essential tremor, and other diseases. This surgical treatment was performed in the 1960s to 1970s and was an alternative to thalamotomy. Recently, there has been increasing interest in the reappraisal of stimulating and/or lesioning these targets, partly as a result of innovations in imaging and noninvasive ablative technologies, such as magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasonography. ⋯ Based on the significant breakthrough that magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasonography has meant in the neurosurgical world, some classic targets such as the pallidothalamic tract, Forel field, and posterior subthalamic area may be reconsidered as surgical alternatives for patients with movement disorders.
-
Publication metrics such as the author-level h-index are often used to evaluate and compare research productivity in academia. The h-index, however, is not a field-normalized statistic and has been criticized as inappropriate for comparison of authors from different fields. For example, fields such as internal medicine have a larger audience and thus afford publications a higher likelihood of increased citations compared with a perhaps equally impactful paper in a smaller field such as neurosurgery. The National Institutes of Health (NIH) has developed a new field-normalized article-level metric called the relative citation ratio (RCR) that can be used to more accurately compare author productivity between fields. Spine represents a distinct subset of neurosurgery with a designated fellowship and distinct differences in the RCR metrics. The authors look to analyze the unique results found in the academic spine neurosurgeon RCR values compared with all academic neurosurgeons. ⋯ Current academic spine neurosurgeons have high median RCR values relative to the NIH standard RCR value of 1.0. Relative to the field of neurological surgery overall, RCR values for the spine subspecialty are comparable. These data offer a more accurate means for self-evaluation of academic neurosurgeons as well as evaluation of faculty by institutional and departmental leaders.