World Neurosurg
-
Review Meta Analysis
Effect of cervical decompression on atypical symptoms cervical spondylosis - A narrative review and meta-analysis.
Atypical symptoms of cervical spondylosis refer to symptoms other than the typical symptoms of cervical spondylosis and include headache, nausea, gastrointestinal discomfort, blurred vision, tinnitus, hypomnesia, and palpitations. The role of cervical decompression in mitigating atypical symptoms of cervical spondylosis is still unclear. ⋯ Our analysis showed that cervicogenic headache, tinnitus, and nausea were significantly relieved after cervical decompression. There was no significant effect of cervical decompression on blurred vision, hypomnesia, giddiness gastrointestinal discomfort, palpitations, and hypertension.
-
Multicenter Study Comparative Study
Chronic subdural hematoma drainage under local anesthesia with sedation versus general anesthesia and its outcome.
Burr hole drainage is the criterion standard treatment for chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH), a common neurosurgical condition. However, apart from the surgical technique, the method of anesthesia also has a significant impact on postoperative patient outcome. Currently, there are limited studies comparing the use of local anesthesia with sedation (LA sedation) versus general anesthesia (GA) in the drainage of CSDH. The objective of this study was to compare the morbidity and mortality outcomes of using LA sedation versus GA in CSDH burr hole drainage. ⋯ This study demonstrates that CSDH drainage under LA sedation is safe and efficacious, with a significantly lower risk of postoperative mortality and morbidity when compared with GA.
-
Review
10-Year Trends in the Surgical Management of Patients with Spinal Metastases: A Scoping Review.
Spinal metastases are present in approximately 20% of patients with cancer, giving a risk for neurologic dysfunction and instability. In already frail patients, surgeons strive to improve quality of life. Our goal was to review a 10-year trend in the surgical management of spinal metastases. ⋯ Minimally invasive techniques for decompression and stabilization seem to be the preferred method to surgically treat metastatic spine disease, with good outcomes. More research with high level of evidence is required to support the long-term outcomes of these approaches.
-
Review Comparative Study
A COMPARATIVE SCIENTOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF THE 100 MOST CITED ARTICLES OF ACTA NEUROCHIRURGICA AND WORLD NEUROSURGERY.
Acta Neurochirurgica (ANCH) and World Neurosurgery (WN), are 2 journals of significant importance in the neurosurgical community and have been associated with international federations. These journals carry a similar impact factor. The difference is the years they have been active (ANCH starting publication in 1973 and WN in 2010). This factor allows for a unique opportunity to delve deep into comparative, scientometric parameters, to understand the evolution of neurosurgical research. ⋯ Neurotrauma and consensus guidelines have been shown to have maximal citations for ANCH whereas endoscopy and skull base lesions garnered the most for WN. Author subspecialization and increased collaboration across specialties with more articles on refinement of technique and outcome have emerged as recent trends.