Qual Saf Health Care
-
Qual Saf Health Care · Dec 2010
A 5-year analysis of rapid response system activation at an in-hospital haemodialysis unit.
To study the incidence, patient and event characteristics, and outcome of rapid response system (RRS) activation on an in-hospital haemodialysis unit. ⋯ From our findings, it can be suggested that critical events often occur before and after dialysis treatment, during or awaiting transport. Careful assessment of these high-risk patients before and after transport, to and from the dialysis unit may be warranted.
-
Qual Saf Health Care · Dec 2010
Pneumococcal vaccination process improvement in an acute care setting.
Despite the availability of the pneumococcal vaccine since 1977, the vaccine is greatly underutilised. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, The Joint Commission and Healthy People 2010 have all listed the administration of the pneumococcal vaccine before hospital discharge as a standard of care and a quality initiative in the 21st century. SSM St Mary's Health Center chartered a multidisciplinary team to address a disappointing pneumococcal vaccination rate of 34.7% in the first quarter of 2005. ⋯ Utilising Plan-Do-Study-Act allows for continual improvement of the vaccination process. Multiple cycles are necessary to achieve standardisation and optimal process flow.
-
Qual Saf Health Care · Dec 2010
ReviewCoping with medical error: a systematic review of papers to assess the effects of involvement in medical errors on healthcare professionals' psychological well-being.
Previous research has established health professionals as secondary victims of medical error, with the identification of a range of emotional and psychological repercussions that may occur as a result of involvement in error.2 3 Due to the vast range of emotional and psychological outcomes, research to date has been inconsistent in the variables measured and tools used. Therefore, differing conclusions have been drawn as to the nature of the impact of error on professionals and the subsequent repercussions for their team, patients and healthcare institution. A systematic review was conducted. ⋯ It is evident that involvement in a medical error can elicit a significant psychological response from the health professional involved. However, a lack of literature around coping and support, coupled with inconsistencies and weaknesses in methodology, may need be addressed in future work.
-
Qual Saf Health Care · Dec 2010
Comparative StudyAdverse events and comparison of systematic and voluntary reporting from a paediatric intensive care unit.
Little is known of the incidence of adverse events in the paediatric intensive care unit (PICU). Perceived incidence may be dependent on data-collection methods. ⋯ Neither voluntary reporting nor systematic enquiry captures all adverse events. While the two methods both capture some events, systematic reporting captures serious events, while voluntary reporting captures mainly insignificant and minor events.
-
Qual Saf Health Care · Dec 2010
Assessing teamwork attitudes in healthcare: development of the TeamSTEPPS teamwork attitudes questionnaire.
The report, To Err is Human, indicated that a large number of deaths are caused by medical error. A central tenet of this report was that patient safety was not only a function of sophisticated healthcare technology and treatments, but also the degree to which healthcare professionals could perform effectively as teams. Research suggests that teamwork comprises four core skills: Leadership, Situation Monitoring, Mutual Support and Communication. In healthcare, team training programmes, such as TeamSTEPPS®, are designed to improve participant knowledge of, attitudes towards, and skills in these core areas. If such training programmes are effective, changes in knowledge, attitudes and skills should be observed. The purpose of this study was to develop and validate the TeamSTEPPS Teamwork Attitudes Questionnaire (T-TAQ), a measure designed to assess attitudes towards the core components of teamwork in healthcare. ⋯ The T-TAQ provides a useful, reliable and valid tool for assessing individual attitudes related to the role of teamwork in the delivery of healthcare. Issues related to its use and interpretation are discussed.