The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery
-
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. · Oct 1987
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialAtrial activity during cardioplegia and postoperative arrhythmias.
Cardioplegia provides excellent protection for the left ventricle, but the right atrium may be poorly protected. Myocardial temperatures, right atrial electrical activity, and postoperative arrhythmias were assessed in 103 patients participating in two consecutive randomized trials comparing blood cardioplegia (n = 36), crystalloid cardioplegia (n = 38), and diltiazem crystalloid cardioplegia (n = 29). Both right atrial and right ventricular temperatures were significantly warmer (p less than 0.05) during delivery of the blood cardioplegic solution than during delivery of either the crystalloid or the diltiazem crystalloid cardioplegic solutions; the aortic root temperatures were 9 degrees +/- 2 degrees C with blood cardioplegia and 5 degrees + 1 degrees C with both crystalloid and diltiazem crystalloid cardioplegia. ⋯ Blood cardioplegia reduced supraventricular arrhythmias by reducing ischemic injury despite warmer intraoperative temperatures and more right atrial activity. Diltiazem crystalloid cardioplegia reduced postoperative arrhythmias by improving intraoperative myocardial protection and suppressing intraoperative and postoperative atrial activity. Crystalloid cardioplegia cooled but did not arrest the right atrium intraoperatively, resulted in the most perioperative ischemic injury, and yielded the highest incidence of postoperative supraventricular arrhythmias.
-
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. · Aug 1987
Early blunt esophagectomy in severe caustic burns of the upper digestive tract. Report of 29 cases.
Caustic ingestion may cause severe necrosis of the upper digestive tract. Of 520 patients admitted in our department for caustic ingestion, 29 (5.5%) underwent emergency esophagogastrectomy because of transmural necrosis. ⋯ This method allowed 18 patients (62%) to survive. Thus it appears to be a safer technique than open thoracic esophagectomy, which we used in our earlier experience.
-
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. · Aug 1987
Monitoring of somatosensory evoked potentials during surgical procedures on the thoracoabdominal aorta. IV. Clinical observations and results.
Thirty-three patients undergoing operations on the descending thoracic or thoracoabdominal aorta were monitored to evaluate causes and effects of spinal cord ischemia as manifested by changes in somatosensory evoked potentials. Maintenance of distal aortic perfusion pressure (greater than 60 mm Hg) by either shunt or bypass techniques in 17 patients resulted in preservation of somatosensory evoked potentials and a normal postoperative neurologic status, irrespective of the interval of thoracic cross-clamping (range 23 to 105 minutes). In 16 other patients in whom cross-clamp time ranged from 16 to 124 minutes, evoked potential loss was observed because of failure to provide distal perfusion (n = 8), inadequate maintenance of distal perfusion pressure (less than 60 mm Hg) despite shunt/bypass (n = 6), or interruption of critical intercostal arteries (n = 2). ⋯ Simple aortic cross-clamping, failure to maintain distal perfusion pressure above 60 mm Hg, and inability to reimplant critical intercostals in a timely fashion result in a high rate of paraplegia if duration of spinal cord ischemia as measured by somatosensory evoked potentials exceeds 30 minutes. Routine evoked potential monitoring during thoracoabdominal procedures appears useful in assessing the adequacy of spinal cord perfusion. Furthermore, it can alert the surgeon to the necessity for critical intercostal artery reimplantation as well as the need for adjustment or regulation of distal aortic perfusion.
-
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. · Aug 1987
Monitoring of somatosensory evoked potentials during surgical procedures on the thoracoabdominal aorta. II. Use of somatosensory evoked potentials to assess adequacy of distal aortic bypass and perfusion after thoracic aortic cross-clamping.
Pulsatile left atrial-femoral artery bypass was instituted after aortic cross-clamping distal to the left subclavian artery in a canine experimental model to determine the relationship of distal aortic perfusion pressure with spinal cord blood flow and somatosensory evoked potentials. In six animals (Group I) distal aortic perfusion pressure was maintained at 100 mm Hg throughout a 1 hour interval of aortic cross-clamping. During this period, somatosensory evoked potentials and spinal cord blood flow (radioactive microspheres) showed no significant change from baseline. ⋯ Maintenance of adequate somatosensory spinal cord conduction after thoracic aortic cross-clamping is dependent on a critical level of distal aortic perfusion that can be accomplished by use of an adjunct such as pulsatile left atrial-femoral artery bypass. The critical level of distal aortic perfusion pressure to maintain normal somatosensory evoked potentials and spinal cord blood flow in this canine experimental study was 70 mm Hg or greater. Because inadequate distal aortic perfusion can be easily detected by monitoring of somatosensory evoked potentials, these techniques should prove helpful in evaluating the effectiveness of distal perfusion techniques during clinical aortic cross-clamping for procedures on the thoracoabdominal aorta.
-
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. · Aug 1987
Early mechanical failures of the Hancock pericardial xenograft.
From August 1981 to July 1984, a total of 97 Hancock pericardial xenografts were implanted in 84 patients, whose ages ranged from 13 to 75 years (mean 55.7 +/- 13). Mitral value replacement was performed in 17, aortic valve replacement in 54, and mitral-aortic valve replacement in 13. Operative survivors were reevaluated from July to September 1985. ⋯ At medium-term follow-up, the Hancock pericardial xenograft has shown poor durability and an extremely high rate of early mechanical failure, especially in the aortic position. These observations suggest the need for a close follow-up of Hancock pericardial xenograft recipients and possibly elective reoperation in asymptomatic patients with clinical evidence of prosthetic failure. These results have led us to discontinue the clinical use of this pericardial xenograft.