J Am Board Fam Med
-
The COVID-19 outbreak is a stark reminder of the ongoing challenge of emerging and reemerging disease, the human cost of pandemics and the need for robust research.1 For primary care, the advent of COVID-19 has forced an unprecedented wave of practice change. In turn, Practice-Based Research Networks (PBRNs) must rapidly pivot to address the changing environment and the critical challenges faced by primary care. The pandemic has also impacted the ability of PBRNs to deploy traditional research methods such as face-to-face patient and provider interactions, practice facilitation, and stakeholder engagement. ⋯ These skills will become more important than ever as primary care practices evolve in response to the current COVID-19 pandemic and the disparities in health outcomes highlighted by COVID-19 and the global Black Lives Matter social movement for justice. Throughout this issue, authors detail the work conducted by PBRNs that demonstrate many of these evolving concepts. Articles explore how PBRNs can evaluate COVID-19 in primary care, the role of PBRNs in quality improvement, stakeholder engagement, prevention and chronic care management, and patient safety in primary care.
-
Family Medicine was a child of the 1960s. Triggered by compelling social need for care outside of large hospitals, Family Medicine emphasized access to personal physicians based in the community. As a protest movement, the ABFP required ongoing recertification for all Diplomates, with both independent examination and chart audit. ⋯ Second, given the role Board Certification plays in supporting improvement of healthcare, Board Certification itself must respond to these changes. Third, to move forward, ABFM and the wider Board community must address a series of wicked problems - i.e., problems which are both complex-with many root causes-and complicated- in which interventions create new problems. The wicked problems confronting board certification include: 1) combining summative and formative assessment, 2) improving quality improvement and 3) reaffirming the social contract and professionalism and its assessment.
-
This issue primarily contains practice-based research reports. For a commentary on these articles, see Tapp.1 JABFM also has a call for submissions and accepted pre-print articles specifically on COVID at our Web site, www.jabfm.org These online COVID-related articles will be collated into a future print issue. This issue also has additional articles, encompassing a range of issues, as is common for JABFM.
-
American Boards of Medical Specialties have emphasized single point in time testing for summative assessment of cognitive expertise necessary for board certification. In 2016, the American Board of Anesthesiology introduced Maintenance of Certification in Anesthesiology (MOCA), a longitudinal assessment platform that provides diplomates formative feedback with continuous questions over time and adapts questions to areas of knowledge weaknesses over time. This paper describes the rationale, history, and early results of the American Board of Anesthesiology MOCA platform.
-
Addressing professionalism is a key role of Certification Boards, but how best to do this is not clear. This article describes a 360° approach to monitoring and enhancing professionalism taken by the American Board of Urology (ABU). ⋯ As a part of its 10-year cycle, the Board requires peer evaluations from other urologists in the community. Finally, and most importantly, ABU uses a portfolio practice log to evaluate the candidates' use of procedures appropriate to their stated subspecialty area of expertise, evaluation of potential overuse or inappropriate use of procedures and a narrative that details any major complications associated with their procedures.