Cochrane Db Syst Rev
-
To estimate the short-term efficacy and toxicity of sulfasalazine for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). ⋯ Sulfasalazine appears to have a clinically and statistically significant benefit on the disease activity of patients with RA. Its effects on overall health status and radiological progression are not clear at this time, but would appear to be modest.
-
Cochrane Db Syst Rev · Jan 2000
ReviewBrief psychological interventions ("debriefing") for trauma-related symptoms and the prevention of post traumatic stress disorder.
To assess the effectiveness of brief psychological debriefing for the management of psychological distress after trauma, and the prevention of post traumatic stress disorder. ⋯ There is no current evidence that psychological debriefing is a useful treatment for the prevention of post traumatic stress disorder after traumatic incidents. Compulsory debriefing of victims of trauma should cease.
-
Even though corticosteroids have been used alongside antituberculosis drugs for tuberculous meningitis (TBM) since the 1950s their role remains controversial. Some believe corticosteroids improve outcome while others point to the lack of supportive evidence. In patients who are immunocompromised because of HIV infection the risks and benefits of steroids are unknown. ⋯ Adjunctive steroids might be of benefit in patients with TBM. However, existing studies are small, and poor allocation concealment and publication bias may account for the positive results found in this review. No data are available on the use of steroids in HIV positive persons. Future placebo-controlled studies should include patients with HIV infection and should be large enough to assess both mortality and disability.
-
Since the advent of in-vitro fertilisation (IVF) the role of infertility surgery has diminished. This type of surgery is still however widely performed.and there are many different surgical techniques that can be used to repair blocked or damaged Fallopian tubes. Most evidence in this area comes from uncontrolled series. ⋯ 1) INFERTILITY SURGERY VERSUS NO TREATMENT One non RCT compared open adhesiolysis versus no treatment and found significantly more pregnancies in the treatment group compared with the control group. 2) INFERTILITY SURGERY VERSUS ALTERNATIVE TREATMENTS. No RCTs investigated the role of infertility surgery compared with In vitro fertilisation (IVF). There were no studies comparing tubal surgery for proximal tubal occlusion versus hysteroscopic or radiologically controlled recannulation. 3) MAGNIFICATION FOR INFERTILITY SURGERY There was a non significant reduction in pregnancy rate when the operating microscope (magnification x4-x16) was used rather than Loupes (magnification x2-x4.5) in the only RCT to study this. One RCT randomised patients to microsurgery versus a macrosurgical technique involving a prosthesis. There were more pregnancies in the microsurgery group, but this was not significant, and the trial consisted of only 18 participants. All the non-RCT studies comparing microsurgery with macrosurgery had a historical control group. Meta-analysis of studies investigating the role of magnification for adhesiolysis and for salpingostomy revealed a statistically significant increase in pregnancy rates and reduction in ectopic pregnancy rates for microsurgery versus macrosurgery for both procedures. For reversal of sterilisation there was a significant improvement in term pregnancy rates, and a non significant reduction in ectopic rates There was no significant difference between microsurgical and macrosurgical treatment of proximal tubal occlusion for any outcome. 4) THE USE OF LASER AT INFERTILITY SURGERY Two RCTs investigated the use of the CO2 laser at infertility surgery. There was no significant difference in pregnancy outcome after adhesiolysis, or salpingostomy. Two non randomised studies also investigated the role of the laser. Overall there was no significant difference using the CO2 laser compared with standard techniques for adhesiolysis, salpingostomy or reversal of sterilisation. 5) LAPAROSCOPIC INFERTILITY SURGERY Four studies investigated the use of laparoscopic techniques for infertility surgery. There were no RCTs. One study compared laparoscopic versus open
-
This review is superseded by the published Cochrane Review, Taylor 2023: https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD014785.pub2/full. ⋯ Given the level of investment in growth monitoring worldwide, it is surprising there is so little research evaluating its potential benefits and harms.