Cochrane Db Syst Rev
-
Cochrane Db Syst Rev · Jan 2004
Review Meta AnalysisThird generation cephalosporins versus conventional antibiotics for treating acute bacterial meningitis.
Antibiotic therapy for suspected acute bacterial meningitis (ABM) needs to be started immediately, even before the results of cerebrospinal fluid culture and antibiotic sensitivity are available. It is not clear whether the available evidence supports the choice of third generation cephalosporins over the conventional antibiotic combination of ampicillin and chloramphenicol. Immediate institution of effective treatment through intravenous route may reduce death and disability in survivors. ⋯ Although the review shows no clinically important difference between ceftriaxone or cefotaxime and conventional antibiotics, the studies are done decades ago and may not apply to current routine practice. However, in situations where ceftriaxone or cefotaxime are not available or affordable, ampicillin-chloramphenicol combination may be used as an alternative. The antimicrobial resistance pattern against various antibiotics needs to be closely monitored in developing as well as developed countries. The factors determining overuse of antibiotics in developing countries and educational interventions to limit such practice are priority area for research in developing countries.
-
Cochrane Db Syst Rev · Jan 2004
Review Meta AnalysisPercutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting for carotid artery stenosis.
Carotid artery stenosis may be treated endovascularly by percutaneous transluminal balloon angioplasty with or without stent insertion or by primary stenting. Endovascular treatment may be a useful alternative to carotid endarterectomy (CEA), particularly for lesions not suitable for surgery. ⋯ Data from randomised trials comparing endovascular treatment for carotid artery stenosis with carotid endarterectomy suggest that the two treatments have similar early risks of death or stroke and similar long term benefits. However, the substantial heterogeneity renders the overall estimates of effect somewhat unreliable. Furthermore, two trials were stopped early because of safety concerns, so perhaps leading to an over-estimate of the risks of endovascular treatment. On the other hand, endovascular treatment appears to avoid completely the risk of cranial neuropathy. There is also uncertainty about the potential for restenosis to develop and cause recurrent stroke after endovascular treatment. The current evidence does not support a widespread change in clinical practice away from recommending carotid endarterectomy as the treatment of choice for suitable carotid artery stenosis. There is a strong case to continue recruitment in the current randomised trials comparing carotid stenting with endarterectomy.
-
Cochrane Db Syst Rev · Jan 2004
Review Meta AnalysisAntifibrinolytic drugs for acute traumatic injury.
Uncontrolled bleeding is an important cause of death in trauma victims. Antifibrinolytic treatment has been shown to reduce blood loss following surgery and may also be effective in reducing blood loss following trauma. ⋯ There is insufficient evidence from randomised controlled trials of antifibrinolytic agents in trauma to either support or refute a clinically important treatment effect. Further randomised controlled trials of antifibrinolytic agents in trauma are required.
-
Umbilical cord infection caused many neonatal deaths before aseptic techniques were used. ⋯ Good trials in low-income settings are warranted. In high-income settings, there is limited research which has not shown an advantage of antibiotics or antiseptics over simply keeping the cord clean. Quality of evidence is low.
-
Cochrane Db Syst Rev · Jan 2004
Review Meta AnalysisHypertonic versus near isotonic crystalloid for fluid resuscitation in critically ill patients.
Hypertonic solutions are considered to have a greater ability to expand blood volume and thus elevate blood pressure and can be administered as a small volume infusion over a short time period. On the other hand, the use of hypertonic solutions for volume replacement may also have important disadvantages. ⋯ This review does not give us enough data to be able to say whether hypertonic crystalloid is better than isotonic and near isotonic crystalloid for the resuscitation of patients with trauma, burns, or those undergoing surgery. However, the confidence intervals are wide and do not exclude clinically significant differences. Further trials which clearly state the type and amount of fluid used and that are large enough to detect a clinically important difference are needed.