Cochrane Db Syst Rev
-
Cochrane Db Syst Rev · Jan 2000
ReviewAudit and feedback versus alternative strategies: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes.
Audit and feedback has been identified as having the potential to change the practice of health care professionals. ⋯ It is not possible to recommend a complementary intervention to enhance the effectiveness of audit and feedback. Reminders might be more effective than audit and feedback to improve the delivery of some preventive services but the results are not striking. Few trials have investigated the effect of varying different characteristics of the audit and feedback process. Consideration should be given to testing the effects of modifying important characteristics such as the content, source, timing, recipient and format.
-
Cochrane Db Syst Rev · Jan 2000
ReviewPatient support and education for promoting adherence to highly active antiretroviral therapy for HIV/AIDS.
Highly active antiretroviral therapy is associated with improved health outcomes for people living with HIV/AIDS. Unfortunately, full therapeutic benefit from HAART may require near-perfect adherence to prescribed regimens. ⋯ Implications for practice Currently a pharmacist-led program of educational and supportive counseling is the only available intervention which has been shown in a controlled study to improve adherence to HAART, with less evidence that viral load is subsequently reduced. Implications for research Controlled trials are urgently needed to determine which interventions can significantly improve adherence to HAART. Whether interventions that improve adherence also suppress viral load and improve clinical outcomes should also be considered.
-
Cochrane Db Syst Rev · Jan 2000
ReviewSurgical treatment for meniscal injuries of the knee in adults.
Injuries to the knee menisci are common and operations to treat them are among the most common procedures performed by orthopaedic surgeons. ⋯ The lack of randomised trials means that no conclusions can be drawn on the issue of surgical versus non-surgical treatment of meniscal injuries, nor meniscal tear repair versus excision. In randomised trials so far reported, there is no evidence of difference in radiological or long term clinical outcomes between arthroscopic and open meniscal surgery, or between total and partial meniscectomy. Partial meniscectomy seems preferable to the total removal of the meniscus in terms of recovery and overall functional outcome in the short term.
-
Cochrane Db Syst Rev · Jan 2000
ReviewLiquid and fluid agents for preventing adhesions after surgery for subfertility.
Pelvic surgery is associated with high rates of both de novo adhesion formation and adhesion reformation. Although the role of pelvic and/or tubal surgery in the management of infertility is more limited since the development of in-vitro fertilisation such surgery remains indicated for a number of selected patients. Other forms of pelvic surgery will remain prevalent in women of reproductive age (e.g. endometriosis surgery, ovarian cystectomy, myomectomy). Since subsequent fertility is reduced with increasing severity of periadnexal adhesions, pelvic adhesions will remain a clinical problem in infertility patients. Adjuvant therapy has been promoted for many years to prevent adhesion formation. Numerous substances have been used experimentally in animal models, many have been advocated for use during human surgery, and some are widely used in clinical practice. Steroids and antihistamines are given in the belief that they will promote fibrinolysis during healing without preventing healing. ⋯ The routine use of pharmacological agents to prevent post-operative adhesions after infertility surgery cannot be recommended on the basis of the available evidence derived from RCTs. In connection with adhesion prevention, the evidence with regard to steroids is far from perfect but tentatively suggests that they may be beneficial. Further randomised studies should be conducted to investigate this further.
-
Cochrane Db Syst Rev · Jan 2000
ReviewAntihypertensive therapy for preventing cardiovascular complications in people with diabetes mellitus.
To assess the effect of intervention, both pharmacological and non-parmacological, to reduce blood pressure in people with diabetes mellitus on all cause mortality, specific causes of death, including cardiovascular disease, stroke, ischaemic heart disease and renal disease, morbidity associated with macro- and microvascular complications of diabetes mellitus and also side effects of the interventions and their influence on quality of life and well being. ⋯ Primary intervention trials indicated a treatment benefit for CVD, but not for total mortality in people with diabetes. For both short- and long-term secondary prevention, the present meta-analysis indicated a benefit for total mortality in diabetic subjects. However lack of information on CVD outcomes probably reduced the power of the meta-analysis to detect any corresponding benefit for this end-point. This, along with the fact that all published data of randomised control trials of anti-hypertensive therapy in diabetes for all cause mortailty and CVD outcomes are taken from the hypertension trials not specific to diabetes, underlines the need for further high quality trials examining the effects of blood pressure lowering interventions in people with diabetes.