Cochrane Db Syst Rev
-
Cochrane Db Syst Rev · Jan 2000
Review Comparative StudyRisperidone versus typical antipsychotic medication for schizophrenia.
The 'conventional' neuroleptic drugs, such as haloperidol and chlorpromazine, are frequently used as the first line treatment for people with schizophrenia. However, about 5-25% of these people show poor response to these treatments and side effects often makes compliance with the 'older generation' of drug treatment problematic. Although the efficacy of these medications with respect to 'positive' symptoms is well described, little evidence exists that 'conventional' antipsychotic treatment has any effect on the 'negative' symptoms of schizophrenia. Risperidone is one of the 'new generation' neuroleptic compounds. As well as its reputed tendency to cause fewer movement disorders it is claimed that risperidone may improve negative symptoms. ⋯ Little can be concluded about the long term effects of risperidone and generalising results beyond a comparison with haloperidol would be imprudent. Risperidone may be more acceptable to those with schizophrenia and have marginal benefits in terms of limited clinical improvement and side
-
To determine therapeutically equivalent doses of inhaled versus oral steroids for adults with chronic asthma. ⋯ A daily dose of prednisolone 7.5-10 mg/day appears to be equivalent to moderate-high dose inhaled corticosteroids. Side-effects may be present on low doses, so if there is no alternative to oral steroids, the lowest effective dose should be prescribed.
-
Cochrane Db Syst Rev · Jan 2000
ReviewTricyclic and related drugs for nocturnal enuresis in children.
Enuresis (bedwetting) is a socially unacceptable and stressful condition which affects around 15-20% of five year olds, and up to 2% of young adults. Although there is a high rate of spontaneous remission, the social, emotional and psychological costs to the children can be great. ⋯ Treatment with tricyclic drugs (imipramine, amitriptyline, viloxazine, clomipramine and desipramine but not mianserin) was associated with a reduction of about one wet night per week while on treatment, but long term effectiveness is unknown. Desmopressin and tricyclics appeared equally effective while on treatment, but this effect was not sustained after treatment stopped. Alarms may be more effective in the long term. Comparisons between drug and behavioural treatments are needed, and should include relapse rates after treatment is finished.
-
Cochrane Db Syst Rev · Jan 2000
ReviewAntifibrinolytic therapy for aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage.
Re-bleeding is an important cause of death and disability in people with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage. This is probably due to dissolution of the clot by natural fibrinolytic activity. ⋯ Antifibrinolytic treatment does not appear to benefit people with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage. However, the trials were all done more than 10 years ago. New strategies may counteract the ischaemia-inducing potential of antifibrinolytic treatment and lead to improved outcome. A trial of combined antifibrinolytic and anti-ischaemia treatment is underway.
-
The majority of strokes are due to blockage of an artery in the brain by a blood clot. Clot dissolving (or thrombolytic) drugs may reduce brain damage from the stroke, but may also cause serious bleeding in the brain. Thrombolytic therapy has now been evaluated in several randomised trials in acute ischaemic stroke. ⋯ Thrombolytic therapy increases deaths within the first seven to ten days, and deaths at final follow-up. Thrombolytic therapy also significantly increases symptomatic and fatal intracranial haemorrhage. These risks are offset by a reduction in disability in survivors, so that there is, overall, a significant net reduction in the proportion of patients dead or dependent in activities of daily living. The data from trials using intravenous recombinant tissue Plasminogen Activator, from which there is the most evidence on thrombolytic therapy so far, suggest that it may be associated with less hazard and more benefit. There was heterogeneity between the trials and the optimum criteria to identify the patients most likely to benefit and least likely to be harmed, the agent, dose, and route of administration, are not clear. (ABSTRACT TRUNCATED)