J Natl Med Assoc
-
The value of including race as part of the patient identifier in care and medical education has been a topic of debate among clinicians, medical educators, and sociologists.1,2,6,7,8 The perceived benefit of using racial identifiers is that it may allow physicians to predict the risk of disease and inform drug therapy.9 This association is thought to be useful to medical students and trainees as they form their clinical knowledge base. However, there is a larger body of evidence that the use of race leads to bias and stereotyping by physicians. In many cases, patients are assigned to racial categorizations that are inconsistent with their self-reported identities.1,15 It is unclear which medical schools have a policy that explicitly detail their stance on this topic. In this article, we propose a frame of thinking to guide medical educators as they develop policies on race as patient identifiers.
-
Minority groups continue to suffer disproportionately from COVID-19's impact, with Blacks and Hispanics three times more likely to die from the disease than their White counterparts. The COVID-19 vaccine roll out has the potential to provide relief to these most adversely impacted communities. However, historic mistrust within racial minority communities threatens to derail the effective implementation of a vaccination program. ⋯ Current day experience with structural racism and research abuses like Tuskegee Study collectively influence our perception of biased healthcare system. We outline issues and propose solutions that must be addressed to achieve a successful vaccination agenda. Mishandling of public expectations at any point may lead to an avalanche of vaccine opposition which might be unrecoverable.
-
Public perceptions and disparities in access to telehealth orthopaedic services in the COVID-19 era.
We used online crowdsourcing to explore public perceptions and attitudes towards virtual orthopaedic care, and to identify factors associated with perceived difficulty navigating telehealth services during the COVID-19 pandemic. ⋯ The majority of the public appears receptive to telehealth for orthopaedic care for both new patient visits and follow-up appointments. The finding that people with multiple chronic conditions and psychosocial needs struggle to engage with telehealth suggests that those who arguably stand to benefit the most from continued care are the ones being unintentionally left out of this digitization boom.
-
Letter
From COVID-19 to cancer, watching social determinants decide life: When will we stop spectating?
The COVID-19 pandemic reminds us that African American, Latinx, Indigenous, and poor communities face significant healthcare disparities. Members of these communities have increased exposure to the virus due to higher rates of crowded living conditions and employment in essential occupations. Furthermore, news reports and public health data show that residents of these communities have more comorbidities, utilize hospitals with fewer resources, and experience greater treatment delays, all resulting in higher mortality related to COVID-19. ⋯ These stark realities demand that we stop merely reporting the impact of adverse social determinants on the health of communities. We must instead target these causes of healthcare disparities. Here, we discuss proposed action items from the 2019 National Cancer Policy Forum workshop entitled "Applying Big Data to Address the Social Determinants of Health in Oncology." These actions are critical first steps to address adverse social determinants and thereby decrease unnecessary deaths in underserved communities.
-
Cancer is the leading cause of disease-related mortality among children, 0-14 years, and lymphoma, a malignant neoplasm of the lymphoid cells, mostly lymphatic B and T cells is common among children. The current study aimed to assess the cumulative incidence (CmI), mortality, and survival in pediatric lymphoma. ⋯ In a large cohort of children with lymphoma, Black/AA children relative to whites presented with survival disadvantage, which was explained by urbanity and median household income, suggestive of transforming the physical and social environments in narrowing the racial differences in pediatric lymphoma survival in the US.