Respiratory care
-
Review Case Reports
Successful epoprostenol withdrawal in pulmonary arterial hypertension: case report and literature review.
Pulmonary arterial hypertension is a rare and devastating disease characterized by vascular proliferation and remodeling. Epoprostenol, the drug counterpart of the eicosanoid prostacyclin, produced by the vascular endothelial cells, is the drug of choice for this disease. Its capacity to act rapidly and to significantly improve survival prospects in severe pulmonary hypertension patients has been supported by a wealth of evidence. ⋯ The availability of newer and less invasive drug therapies for pulmonary arterial hypertension led physicians to withdraw epoprostenol in carefully selected patients. We report a case of successful intravenous epoprostenol interruption in a patient with idiopathic disease. A literature review on epoprostenol withdrawal in pulmonary hypertension in adult patients is also provided.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial
Noninvasive ventilation coupled with nebulization during asthma crises: a randomized controlled trial.
Despite the clinical improvements attributed to noninvasive ventilation (NIV) during asthma crises, and the well established effects of nebulization, there are few studies on the effects of these interventions together. We hypothesized that nebulization coupled to NIV should raise radio-aerosol pulmonary deposition in asthmatics. The aims of this study were to assess the effects of coupling β-agonist nebulization and NIV during asthma exacerbations on radio-aerosol pulmonary deposition, using scintigraphy and cardiopulmonary parameters, to correlate pulmonary function with radio-aerosol deposition index, radio-aerosol penetration index, and pulmonary clearance. ⋯ Coupling nebulization and NIV during asthma exacerbation did not improve radio-aerosol pulmonary deposition, but we observed clinical improvement of pulmonary function in these subjects. (ClinicalTrials.gov registration NCT01012050).
-
Practice Guideline
AARC Clinical Practice Guideline. Surfactant replacement therapy: 2013.
We searched the MEDLINE, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library databases for English-language randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews, and articles investigating surfactant replacement therapy published between January 1990 and July 2012. By inspection of titles, references having no relevance to the clinical practice guideline were eliminated. The update of this clinical practice guideline is based on 253 clinical trials and systematic reviews, and 12 articles investigating surfactant replacement therapy. The following recommendations are made following the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation scoring system: 1: Administration of surfactant replacement therapy is strongly recommended in a clinical setting where properly trained personnel and equipment for intubation and resuscitation are readily available. 2: Prophylactic surfactant administration is recommended for neonatal respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) in which surfactant deficiency is suspected. 3: Rescue or therapeutic administration of surfactant after the initiation of mechanical ventilation in infants with clinically confirmed RDS is strongly recommended. 4: A multiple surfactant dose strategy is recommended over a single dose strategy. 5: Natural exogenous surfactant preparations are recommended over laboratory derived synthetic suspensions at this time. 6: We suggest that aerosolized delivery of surfactant not be utilized at this time.