Masui. The Japanese journal of anesthesiology
-
Comparative Study
[Comparison between T-connecter and three-way stopcock as a portal for obtaining samples from indwelling catheter].
The accuracy of measurements on a sample obtained via either T-connecter or three-way stopcock connected directly with an indwelling catheter was comparatively evaluated. The sample was obtained through them after drawing glucose standard fluid (100 mg.dl-1) into a catheter which was primed with saline. ⋯ The results showed that both sample volume and discarded volume required smaller amount with a T-connecter than with a three-way stopcock to obtain more accurate measurements. The results also suggested that remaining discard aliquot in the connecting port of the three-way stopcock might influence the accuracy of the obtained sample when the sample volume was small.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
[Continuous intravenous pethidine infusion for analgesia after upper abdominal surgery: a randomized, prospective double-blind comparison with continuous epidural infusion of pethidine].
We conducted a randomized double-blind controlled study comparing patients receiving continuous intravenous pethidine infusion with those receiving continuous epidural infusion for postoperative analgesia after upper abdominal surgery. Twenty patients scheduled for upper abdominal surgery were randomized into 2 groups: IV Group (n = 10) received 100 mg.24 h-1 of pethidine intravenously and saline epidurally, Epi Group (n = 10) received 100 mg.24 h-1 of pethidine epidurally and saline intravenously. During 24-hour postoperatively, verbal descriptor pain scale, sedative scale, respiratory rate, pulse rate and blood pressure were evaluated at each 2 hours. ⋯ However in the first 12 hours postoperatively, VAS in Epi Group tended to be lower than that in IV Group. There was no respiratory depression in either group. We conclude that continuous intravenous infusion of 100 mg.24h-1 of pethidine was effective for postoperative analgesia after upper abdominal surgery without major side effects, and almost the same analgesic effect was obtained as compared with continuous epidural analgesia.
-
Comparative Study Clinical Trial
[The reduction in the local anesthetic dose required for a caudal epidural block in infants and children using a Teflon cannula].
We investigated the spread of mepivacaine mixed with a radio-opaque substance in caudal epidural anesthesia for hernioplasty in 37 patients aged from 3 months to 5 years. All patients were placed in the left lateral position. Conventional caudal epidural anesthesia was performed on one group of patients (Group C) using a 23 gauge needle (25 mm in length). ⋯ When the volume for 13 segmental anesthesia (11.5 +/- 2.8 ml) was injected in Group C patients, the cephalad spread of the anesthetic reached Th12.6 +/- 1.2 on the left side, and Th12.5 +/- 1.1 on the right side. In conclusion, we detected no significant difference between Group C and Group N in the cephalad spread of the anesthetic. The required dose of local anesthetic for caudal epidural anesthesia using the Teflon cannula was about two-third the volume of that used for the conventional local anesthetic method.
-
Comparative Study Clinical Trial
[Combined spinal and epidural anesthesia for orthopaedic surgery in the elderly].
The pros and cons as to which anesthesia is more beneficial, either spinal or epidural, prompted us to perform combined spinal and epidural block in the elderly undergoing lower limb surgery. The selected epidural space was entered with a 17-gauge Tuohy needle and a longer 26-gauge spinal needle was passed through it and into the subarachnoid space. ⋯ This combination of techniques provides a rapid onset and reliability of spinal block with high quality analgesia by supplementation through the epidural catheter during and after surgery. In the orthopaedic procedures on the lower limbs, combined spinal and epidural block is more useful even for the elderly over the age of 80 yr than spinal or epidural anesthesia alone.
-
Clinical Trial
[Continuous infusion of ketamine and midazolam for prolonged sedation in the intensive care unit].
The clinical effects and pharmacokinetics of ketamine and midazolam, administered continuously for prolonged sedation were studied in 7 critically ill patients under mechanical ventilation. Initially ketamine 1 mg.kg-1 and midazolam 0.1 mg.kg-1 were administered intravenously and these were followed by infusion at a rate of 1.0 mg.kg-1.hr-1 of ketamine and 0.05 mg.kg-1.hr-1 of midazolam. The infusion rate was changed every 30 minute with increments of 0.5 mg.kg-1.hr-1 of ketamine and 0.05 mg.kg-1.hr-1 of midazolam until the sedative score by Ramsy RAE reached rank 4 (i.e. slow response to loud verbal commands). ⋯ The time to clear response to verbal commands after cessation of the continuous infusion was 168 +/- 109 min. The plasma concentrations of ketamine and midazolam decreased rapidly, and plasma half-life of ketamine was about 1 hour and for midazolam less than 2 hours. In conclusion, continuous infusion of ketamine and midazolam was very useful to sedate critically ill patients under mechanical ventilation, with minimal effect on the cardiovascular system and rapid recovery of consciousness.