The Journal of burn care & rehabilitation
-
J Burn Care Rehabil · Jul 2003
Noncontact laser Doppler imaging in burn depth analysis of the extremities.
The purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy and practical utility of a noncontact laser Doppler imager (PIM-II, Lisca Development AB, Linköping, Sweden) in the estimation of burn depth in the upper and lower extremities. At 48 hours after burn injury, we performed scans of 35 burns in 22 patients and obtained histological samples for burn determination with hematoxylin and eosin and vimentin immunohistochemical staining. Additionally, sequential scans and tissue specimens were obtained on 10 burns at 24, 48, and 72 hours. ⋯ Superficial dermal burns exhibited increased perfusion in the early burn period. Wounds showed a progressive decline in perfusion and a progressive increase in the depth of injury during a 72-hour period. This study demonstrates the advantage and accuracy of using a noncontact laser Doppler to differentiate deep dermal from superficial partial thickness burns in the extremities.
-
J Burn Care Rehabil · Jul 2003
Serial measurements increase the accuracy of laser Doppler assessment of burn wounds.
Traditional methods of judging burn depth by clinical evaluation of the wound based on appearance and sensation remain in wide use but are subject to individual variation by examiner. In addition to the clinical difficulties with burn wound management, observer dependency of wound assessment complicates clinical trials of burn wound therapy. ⋯ Serial measurement with laser Doppler flowmetry had an 88% specificity and a positive predictive value of 81% for identifying nonhealing wounds. These results suggest that laser Doppler flowmetry is a potentially useful tool for burn wound assessment.
-
J Burn Care Rehabil · Jul 2003
Population-based assessment of burn injury in southern Iowa: identification of children and young-adult at-risk groups and behaviors.
Although nonfatal burn injuries vastly outnumber fatal injuries, their epidemiology is not well defined. We sought to determine the epidemiology of nonfatal burn injuries in a largely rural region of a midwestern state to target intervention efforts at populations and injury mechanisms at risk. Data were retrospectively collected on a population-based sample of medically treated burn injuries in 10 counties in southern Iowa from 1997 to 1999 using International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification codes (ICD-9-CM, Ncode 940-949) to identify burn-related emergency room visits from computerized lists. ⋯ Children and young adults ages 5 to 24 were also the most likely to be injured by flame and fire-related causes secondary to open fires. Nonfatal burn injuries typically afflict children and young adults in definable patterns, suggesting intervention strategies. Future studies need to better delineate the contributing factors associated with these injuries to refine the intervention strategies.
-
There are many obstacles in undertaking psychological burns research with children and adolescents, and the more useful longitudinal studies are particularly fraught with difficulty. This work introduces and discusses the problems of attrition and nonparticipation encountered in our attempt to use a rigorous design and methodology to study this population. The aim is to provide the impetus for a more thorough, detailed review of this problem.
-
J Burn Care Rehabil · Jul 2003
Comparative StudyChanges in subjective vs objective burn scar assessment over time: does the patient agree with what we think?
It is not known whether objective measurements of burn scar quality reflect, or even bear any relationship to, the patient's opinion of their scar. The purpose of this study was to determine whether any correlation exists between the rehabilitation therapist's rating of the scar using the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) and the patient's subjective opinion of their scar. A total of 37 scars in 20 adult patients (mean age, 34 +/- 13 years; 30% female; mean %TBSA burn, 16 +/- 11%) were evaluated at 3.1 +/- 1.9 months after injury (early assessment). ⋯ As the scar improves over time, the patient's opinion of their scar appears to improve and shows better correlation with the VSS rating. Conversely, the patient's impression of what others think of the scar continues to bear no relationship to the VSS rating, suggesting that scar acceptance by the patient is incomplete despite objective improvement in the quality of the scar. Although the VSS was never intended to measure a patient's opinion of their scar, these preliminary findings emphasize the necessity of including a patient-centered subjective component to routine scar monitoring and assessment.