Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica. Supplementum
-
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand Suppl · Jan 1988
ReviewSedation by the use of inhalation agents in dental care.
Nitrous oxide/oxygen has long been the mixture of gases used in dental practice to produce light sedation. The main indication for use of nitrous oxide/oxygen sedation is fear-anxiety. The equipment used is a continuous flow machine with a fail safe system set at a minimum of 30 or 40 per cent oxygen. ⋯ Side effects, e.g. restlessness, vomiting, and nausea are infrequent. About 90 per cent patients, who have difficulty in co-operating during dental treatment, mainly because of anxiety, show excellent or fair co-operation during nitrous oxide/oxygen sedation. Occupational exposure to nitrous oxide can be minimized by the use of scavenging systems, local exhaust systems, careful sedation technique, and equipment management.
-
Although the scientific study of pain in the modern sense was initiated 150 years ago, and a number of theories were subsequently proposed, until two decades ago pain research remained conceptually stagnant and the meager amount done was not commensurate with the magnitude and clinical importance of pain. Consequently, pain treatment remained somewhat empirical and ineffective. ⋯ Fortunately, during the past 20 years significant advances have been made in our knowledge of basic mechanisms of acute pain and about some chronic pain syndromes, and a variety of new therapeutic modalities have been introduced and old ones have been refined. Among the most important advances of the past decade have been the discovery of opiate receptors, the extensive pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies of narcotics, the development of very sensitive analytic techniques and mathematic knowledge and many other advances which have prompted the development of new drugs, novel drug preparations and novel methods of administration, of which intraspinal narcotic therapy is the most important and widely used.
-
From a survey of the recent literature on chronic intraspinal morphine administration for cancer pain concerning 412 cases, the present authors observe that: 1. data regarding follow-up on pain relief and complications are lacking; 2. continuous administration by closed systems shows more efficacy in long-term pain relief; 3. tolerance, although not reported by all authors, is present and becomes remarkable in prolonged administration; 4. serious side-effects are less frequent with the epidural administration technique. These data are confirmed by the present authors' clinical experience of 22 patients treated with epidural morphine administration and 53 patients treated with intrathecal morphine. The widespread use of these methods is limited not only by technical complications but also by the existence of certain types of pain which do not respond to morphine and which may develop, as part of the evolution of the neoplastic disease, even during treatment with intraspinal morphine.
-
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand Suppl · Jan 1987
Review Historical ArticleIntraspinal analgesia: an historical overview.
The application of opioids in the proximity of the spinal cord is a recent addition to the forms of treatment available for pain relief. During the last 20 years we have learned more about the intimate mechanisms of the action of opiates then we had in the preceding 5 millennia. Opium, in fact, has been used for medical purposes from prehistoric times. On the basis of the newly acquired knowledge, we are now applying opioids in more effective ways and providing more patients with long overdue relief of their pain.