Aging (Milan, Italy)
-
Aging (Milan, Italy) · Dec 2000
Characteristics associated with inappropriate hospital use in elderly patients admitted to a general internal medicine service.
Our objective was to identify patient characteristics associated with inappropriate hospital days in a cohort of elderly medical inpatients. This prospective cohort study included a total of 196 patients aged 75 years and older, who were consecutively admitted over eight months to the internal medicine service of a regional, non-academic public hospital located in a rural area of Western Switzerland. Patients with severe cognitive impairment, terminal disease, or previously living in a nursing home were excluded. ⋯ In conclusion, patients living alone, functionally impaired and showing depressive symptoms were at increased risk for inappropriate hospital days. These characteristics might permit better targeting for early discharge planning in these at-risk subjects, and contribute to avoiding premature discharge of other vulnerable elderly patients. Whether these interventions for at-risk patients will also result in prevention of hospitalization hazards, such as deconditioning and related functional decline, will require further study.
-
This study examined the applicability of three different pain rating scales, the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), the Graphic Rating Scale (GRS) and the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), in geriatric patients. Data collection was performed in a geriatric clinic at a university hospital. A structured interview was conducted with 167 patients (mean age = 80.5 years). ⋯ The study suggests that pain rating scales such as the VAS, GRS and NRS can be used to evaluate pain experience in geriatric patients. However, agreement between verbally expressed experience of PAH, and the rated experience of pain tended to decrease with advancing age. This indicates that the pain-evaluating process will be substantially improved by an additional penetration supported by a wide variety of expression of hurt, ache, pain, discomfort and distress.
-
Aging (Milan, Italy) · Aug 1999
Severity of hand osteoarthritis and its association with upper extremity impairment in a population of disabled older women: the Women's Health and Aging Study.
Most severity indices of osteoarthritis (OA) include measures of physical function which render them unsuitable for assessing the impact of OA on disability. Data from 1002 moderate to severely disabled community-dwelling women > or = 65 years were used to develop hand OA severity indices which are independent of functional status. Baseline exams and strength tests were conducted by trained nurse examiners. ⋯ When the 25th, 50th and 75th percentiles were used to divide each severity index into levels of involvement, a threshold effect was observed with significantly poorer grip strength performance above the 75th percentile for each index. Similar results were seen for pinch strength. In conclusion, these hand OA severity indices, based on examination findings alone, help distinguish disease status, and may provide a valuable research tool for investigating the role of hand OA in impairment and disability.
-
The purpose of this study was to examine the influence of cognitive function and other biopsychosocial factors on test-retest agreement, four-week variability, and intensity of self-reported pain using the verbal 0 to 10 scale and a pain thermometer in 115 nursing home residents over four weeks. Pain was assessed twice on three days during week 1, and once each during weeks 2, 3 and 4. A forward stepwise regression procedure was used to examine the influence of biopsychosocial parameters (age, race, gender, educational status, marital status, comorbidity, cognitive function, depression, social support, physical function and self-rated health) on pain intensity, test-retest agreement and variability. ⋯ Higher Folstein scores were also associated with greater pain intensity for both pain scales (p < 0.001). Baseline pain intensity was significantly related to pain variability (0-10 scale only). The clinician should be cognizant of these relationships when interpreting verbalizations of pain in long-term care facilities.
-
Aging (Milan, Italy) · Aug 1998
Comparative StudyIs the telephone interview for cognitive status a valid alternative in persons who cannot be evaluated by the Mini Mental State Examination?
The Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE), a widely used tool for first-line assessment of cognitive function, cannot be fully administered to persons with severe visual or upper extremity impairments. This cross-sectional study, which was performed in a sample of patients admitted to the outpatient clinic of the INRCA Geriatric Department "I Fraticini" (Firenze, Italy) and their relatives, evaluated whether the Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status (TICS), a test originally created for telephone screening of cognitive impairment, is a valid alternative for assessment of cognition in persons who cannot provide valid responses to all the MMSE items. Fifteen subjects in each of seven MMSE strata (9-11, 12-14, 15-17, 18-20, 21-23, 24-26, 27-30) were consecutively selected. ⋯ More than 90% of the cases "screening positive" (i.e., scoring below a certain cut-off) by the TICS, were also identified as "screening positive" when comparable MMSE cut-off scores were used. Using comparable cut-off scores, the sensitivity and specificity of TICS and MMSE in detecting a standard clinical diagnosis of dementia largely overlapped. In persons who cannot be evaluated with the MMSE in its full form, the face-to-face administration of the TICS is a reliable and valid alternative.