Zentralblatt für Chirurgie
-
The perioperative use of anticoagulants in general thoracic surgery can be considered to be a "two-edged sword": the goal to minimise the risk of a thromboembolic episode is contrary to the ongoing effort of the surgeon to minimise the risk of intra- and postoperative blood loss. Dispositional factors such as excessive tobacco use are common for thoracic surgery patients and often lead to cardiovascular comorbidity which necessitates the use of anticoagulants or antiplatelet drugs. ⋯ Unfortunately there are not enough existing data and published literature for evidence-based guidelines referring to the correct perioperative management for the new oral anticoagulants. Management algorithms are being recommended according to the multiple aspects of anticoagulant-treatment.
-
The relevance of hollow organ trauma in severely injured patients within a large collective has not been thoroughly reviewed as yet. This study aimed at assessing the prevalence of hollow organ trauma in relation to the outcome and the currently established method of treatment. ⋯ The results presented here show the prevalence and the outcome of hollow organ injury in a large collective within the Trauma Register of the DGU for the first time.
-
The therapeutic strategies for oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer have changed over the last decade from palliative to curative intent. The role of surgery in this multimodal treatment in selected patients remains a subject for open discussion. ⋯ Surgery in oligometastatic non-small cell lung carcinoma is feasible for primary tumour and for metastases. It is an effective option in the multimodal treatment in highly selected patients. The lymph node dissection should remain an important integral part of the surgical treatment.
-
Review Comparative Study
[From heparin to apixaban: anticoagulants cut both ways?].
Regarding anticoagulant therapies there has been a remarkable shift in recent years. The objective of this brief overview is to provide relevant information and guidelines on the advantages and disadvantages of novel anticoagulants addressing specifically the surgical disciplines. Hitherto, conventional anticoagulant therapy in patients with a high thrombosis risk was largely limited to heparins and vitamin-K antagonists (VKA). Their modes of action, the difficulties in managing VKAs (e.g., bridging therapy) and the risk of HIT (heparin-induced thrombocytopenia) associated with heparins are briefly discussed. Novel anticoagulants supposedly eliminate these obstacles. Fondaparinux (Arixtra®) is a fully synthetic pentasaccharide which acts like a heparin but has an increased half life. Fondaparinux has a diminished risk of HIT. However, no specific antidote is currently available for Fondaparinux. The novel oral anticoagulants (NOAC) dabigatran etexilat (Pradaxa®), rivaroxaban (Xarelto®) and apixaban (Eliquis®), also known as "direct" anticoagulants, act independently from antithrombin by inhibiting thrombin, as in the case of dabigatran, or by inhibiting factor Xa, as in the case of rivaroxaban and apixaban. It is assumed that they are suitable for long-term use and do not require laboratory monitoring. Nevertheless, clinical experience is very limited and caution rather than quick conclusions is necessary. Two major drawbacks are on the one hand the risk of drug accumulation in kidney and/or liver disease and, on the other hand, the lack of specific antidotes. In addition, interactions with other medication may have unexpected effects on serum drug levels. Therefore, the analysis of drug levels in the plasma may become necessary in subgroups of patients. ⋯ Studies establishing clear recommendations for the desirable and measurable reference range are needed. Similarly, evidence-based recommendations regarding perioperative prevention of thrombosis are required ("bridging": yes or no?). Irrespective of these issues, the authors predict a further expansion of the use of NOACs.