Bulletin du cancer
-
Multicenter Study
[Management of anaemia in patient with cancer: results of the F-ACT study (French Anaemia Cancer Treatment)].
Anaemia is one of the most dreaded complications among patients with malignant pathologies. Its causes can be varied and whatever its severity, the impact on the quality of life of the patient remains essential. However, the epidemiologic data concerning anaemia are very few in the literature. ⋯ Approximately 2/3 of the anaemic patients received treatment by erythropoiesis stimulating agent (ESA) and approximately 17% of them did not receive any specific treatment for this anaemia. The median level of Hb at the introduction of the ESA was 10 g/dl. These results, compared with those reported in study ECAS (European Cancer Anaemia Survey) in 2001, seem to show an improvement in the management of anaemia and the use of the ESA, in particular an earlier introduction of this type of treatment since the appearance of anaemia.
-
Multicenter Study
[Multisite validation study of questionnaire assessing out-patient satisfaction with care questionnaire in ambulatory chemotherapy or radiotherapy treatment].
Patient satisfaction is now recognised as an important quality of care outcome which is particularly relevant in oncology. Adapted from the EORTC In-Patsat32, the Out-Patsat35 is a 35-item satisfaction with care questionnaire measuring cancer outpatients' perception of hospital doctors and nurses, as well as aspects of care organisation and services. This study assessed the psychometric properties of this scale. ⋯ Items and subscales of the Out-Patsat35 and of the QLQ-C30 were not significantly correlated, underlying that the two questionnaires are assessing quite distinct concepts. The subscales of the Out-Patsat35 were not related to age, gender and education, suggesting a cultural evolution in French cancer patients towards a greater homogeneity in their opinion toward care. This study supports the acceptability to patients, and the psychometric properties of the EORTC Out-Patsat35 questionnaire.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Comparative Study Clinical Trial
[Economic assessment of Caelyx versus topotecan in advanced ovarian cancer].
Ovarian cancer is the most frequent cause of death due to gynecologic malignancy in both the United States and in Europe. A phase III investigation compared second line treatment Caelyx with topotecan in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian carcinoma who failed a first-line platinum-containing regimen. A total of 474 patients were enrolled Although no significant advantage of Caelyx over topotecan with regards to overall survival and progression was found, there were fewer adverse events in the Caelyx arm and Caelyx had significantly better quality of life profile. We conducted a cost minimization analysis of both treatment arms. Costs were estimated from the viewpoint of the hospital, over the duration of the study period (12 weeks). The frequency of adverse events was derived from the trial's CRF, the treatment patterns of adverse events was estimated for each type of adverse event and each grade for a given type of adverse event. Costs included that of the drug and management of adverse events. Because of uncertainty on actual time spent in French hospitals, administration costs were not valued. Adverse events valued in the analysis were: stomatitis/ pharyngitis, PPE, nausea/vomiting diarrhea, anemia, thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, sepsis, fever. Drug costs and costs of blood products were valued using the purchase price by the hospital, costs of tests and hospital days were estimated from the hospital's accounting system. The drug cost per patient was 8,735 euros for Caelyx and 6,196 euros for topotecan, the cost of adverse events were 528 and 3,632 euros for Caelyx and topotecan respectively, due to the high rate of adverse events in patient treated with topotecan. The total costs were 9,279 and 9,938 for Caefyx and topotecan respectively. ⋯ the least expensive management for second line advanced ovarian cancer is Caelyx. Although the initial cost of the drug is higher, the reduced number of adverse events results in a lower total cost. Because treatment with Caelyx is also associated with a better of quality of life, this treatment strategy could be considered dominant.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Clinical Trial
[Oral granisetron solution as prophylaxis for chemotherapy-induced emesis in children: double-blind study of 2 doses].
This multicentric double-blind, dose-ranging study was to compare efficacy and safety of two oral doses of granisetron solution in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced emesis in children with malignant diseases : 294 children, aged 1 to 16, treated with a moderately or highly emetogenic chemotherapy were randomly assigned to receive oral granisetron either 20 microg/kg (n = 143) or 40 microg/kg (n = 151) before and 6 to 12 hours after the start of chemotherapy. Fifty-one percent of patients treated with 20 microg/kg bd of oral granisetron solution achieved a complete response (no vomiting, no worse than mild nausea, no rescue therapy and no withdrawal during the specified period) and 59% achieved a major response (no more than one episode of vomiting, no worse than mild nausea, no rescue therapy and no withdrawal during the specified period). ⋯ In conclusion, oral granisetron suspension either at 20 microg/kg bd or at 40 microg/kg bd showed good efficacy and safety in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced emesis in children with malignant diseases. Oral granisetron solution can be used as prophylaxis of emesis in children receiving moderately or highly emetogenic chemotherapy.
-
Multicenter Study
[Primary chemotherapy with the Rosen T10 protocol before conservative surgery in limb primitive osteosarcomas: results about 56 cases].
We report the results of a prospective Tunisian study using primary chemotherapy followed by conservative surgery in primitive limb osteosarcoma. From January 1988 to January 1998, 56 patients affected by limb osteosarcoma entered in a prospective study of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with the T10 protocol before surgery with a conservative intent. Initial work-up include: clinical exam with tumor measurements, chest and limb X-rays, limb CT-scan or MRI, chest CT-scan, bone scintigraphy and hematological and renal biological exams. ⋯ With a median follow-up of 51 months (8 to 128), 29 patients remain alive free of disease (15/17 GR and 14/30 BR), 2 are alive with disease, 2 died by toxicity, 14 died by progressive disease and 9 are lost to follow-up with evolutive disease. Five year disease-free survival is 55% for the 46 non metastatic patients. In univariate analysis, seric alkaline phosphatase level (p = 0.0014) and histological response to chemotherapy (p = 0.0218) are significant factors for prognosis.