Seminars in oncology
-
Seminars in oncology · Oct 1995
Doxorubicin/paclitaxel combination chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer: the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group experience.
The addition of paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ) to the therapeutic armamentarium for breast cancer has resulted in novel opportunities and challenges for the clinician. In a series of trials that began in 1992, the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) investigated the role of paclitaxel in combination with doxorubicin for the treatment of patients with advanced breast cancer. The design of the first trial, a limited-institution pilot study, involved alternating doxorubicin and paclitaxel as single agents. ⋯ This trial will close to accrual in September 1995, and analysis of the trial should provide useful information regarding the potential synergy of doxorubicin and paclitaxel, the degree of cross-resistance between the two compounds, and the relationship between steady-state paclitaxel levels and response to therapy. In addition, ECOG is currently conducting a trial designed to confirm the striking activity of cisplatin and paclitaxel seen in the British Columbia trials. Future trials by the group will examine means of combining paclitaxel with other active agents.
-
Seminars in oncology · Oct 1995
Review Comparative StudyCarboplatin versus cisplatin in ovarian cancer.
The predominant data from clinical trials of advanced ovarian cancer have documented that carboplatin is equivalent to cisplatin in activity and causes considerably less ototoxicity, neurotoxicity, and nephrotoxicity. A large meta-analysis of over 2,000 patients entered into phase III clinical studies showed that patients with advanced ovarian cancer had virtually identical survival durations when treated with carboplatin- versus cisplatin-containing regimens. Furthermore, in the recent National Institutes of Health Consensus Conference on Ovarian Cancer, it was concluded that "data from mature randomized clinical trials have indicated that the combination of carboplatin and cyclophosphamide is effective therapy" and that "the substitution of carboplatin for cisplatin leads to more acceptable toxicity." Cisplatin appears to be the analog of choice for intraperitoneal therapy, which has proven superior to intravenous (IV) therapy in a recently completed intergroup study. ⋯ In the SWOG, two different high-dose regimens followed by autologous bone marrow transplantation are being evaluated in the setting of a phase II randomized trial. These regimens include high-dose carboplatin/cyclophosphamide/mitoxantrone and high-dose cisplatin/cyclophosphamide/thiotepa. The results of these and other GOG and SWOG trials will dictate the management of advanced ovarian cancer through the end of the century.
-
Standard treatment for patients with advanced ovarian cancer has been cytoreductive surgery followed by combination chemotherapy. Until recently, platinum-based chemotherapy was considered optimal and patients were treated with regimens built around either cisplatin or carboplatin. Recently, paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ) has been shown to be a highly active agent in refractory ovarian cancer patients. ⋯ All current Gynecologic Oncology Group protocols for untreated patients with ovarian cancer use a paclitaxel-based regimen. These clinical trials are evaluating the relative efficacy of carboplatin plus paclitaxel versus cisplatin plus paclitaxel as well as differences in dose and schedule and number of cycles of treatment. Investigational studies are continuing with high-dose chemotherapy that requires hematologic support as well as with intraperitoneal therapy (cisplatin or paclitaxel).
-
Seminars in oncology · Oct 1995
Clinical TrialA phase I study of cisplatin, etoposide, and paclitaxel in small cell lung cancer: a University of Colorado Cancer Center study.
The University of Colorado Cancer Center is conducting a phase I study of the three-drug PET combination of cisplatin, etoposide, and paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ) in patients with advanced (stage IV or IIIB with pleural effusion) small cell lung cancer. The primary study goal was to define the maximally tolerated doses given on an outpatient basis. Secondary goals were to determine toxicities, response rate, response duration, and survival. ⋯ Thus far, partial responses have been observed in four patients (44%) and complete responses in five patients (56%), for an overall response rate of 100%. This ongoing study has shown that full doses of each of these three active drugs can be administered safely on an outpatient basis. The encouraging early results should lead to a multicenter phase II evaluation of the PET combination.