Clinical orthopaedics and related research
-
Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. · Mar 1998
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialUnipolar versus bipolar hemiarthroplasty for the treatment of femoral neck fractures in the elderly.
This paper presents the short term results of an ongoing prospective randomized trial comparing a cemented unipolar with a cemented bipolar hemiarthroplasty for the treatment of displaced femoral neck fractures in the elderly. Forty-seven patients with an average age of 77 years completed 6-month followup. Outcomes at 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months were assessed by completion of a patient oriented hip outcome instrument and by functional tests of walking speed and endurance. ⋯ Patients treated with a bipolar hemiarthroplasty had greater range of hip motion in rotation and abduction and had faster walking speeds. However, no differences in hip rating outcomes were found. These early results suggest that use of the less expensive unipolar prosthesis for hemiarthroplasty after femoral neck fracture may be justified in the elderly.
-
Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. · Mar 1998
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialIntramedullary versus extramedullary fixation for the treatment of intertrochanteric hip fractures.
One hundred thirty-one patients (135 fractures) who sustained an intertrochanteric fracture were assigned randomly to treatment with either a sliding hip screw or an intramedullary hip screw and followed up prospectively. In patients with unstable intertrochanteric fractures, the intramedullary device was associated with 23% less surgical time and 44% less blood loss; however, use of the intramedullary hip screw in patients who had a stable fracture pattern required 70% greater fluoroscopic time. Intraoperative complications occurred exclusively in patients in the intramedullary hip screw group. There were no differences in the rates of functional recovery between the two fixation groups.
-
Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. · Mar 1998
Functional outcome after hip fracture. Effect of general versus regional anesthesia.
The effect of anesthetic technique on ambulation and functional recovery after hip fracture was studied in a series of 631 community dwelling, elderly patients. Functional recovery at followup was determined by an 11-item functional rating scale. In univariate analysis, recovery of ambulatory ability and percent functional recovery were significantly higher at 6 months for patients who had general anesthesia. When controlling for potential confounding variables, however, no differences were observed in recovery of ambulatory ability or percent functional recovery between the two groups at 3, 6, or 12 months after hip fracture.
-
Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. · Mar 1998
Case ReportsSubcoracoid dislocation of the distal end of the clavicle. A case report.
Subcoracoid dislocation of the outer end of the clavicle in association with an acromial fracture is a rare injury usually produced by high energy trauma that moves the clavicle posterior to the conjoined tendon and inferior to the coracoid process. To restore the acromioclavicular joint, open reduction is needed. ⋯ The acromial fracture can be reduced and held with nonabsorbable sutures placed through the bone. To avoid osteolysis of the distal end of the clavicle and to be able to repair the torn ligaments, treatment should not be delayed.
-
Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. · Mar 1998
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialComparison of the compression hip screw with the Medoff sliding plate for intertrochanteric fractures.
The Medoff sliding plate was designed to achieve compression along the femoral neck and the longitudinal axis of the femoral shaft theoretically to improve the treatment of intertrochanteric hip fractures. The Medoff sliding plate was compared with a standard compression hip screw in a randomized, prospective study for the fixation of 160 stable and unstable intertrochanteric fractures with an average followup of 9.5 months (range, 6-26 months). Overall, 91 fractures were treated using the compression hip screw and 69 were treated with the Medoff sliding plate. ⋯ The time to union for the 114 unstable fractures was not significantly different between the two devices. For all patients, no differences in lengths of hospitalization, return to ambulatory status before fracture, postoperative living status, or postoperative pain was observed between the two device groups. Use of the Medoff plate for all fracture types was associated with a significantly higher amount of blood loss and operating time.