Acta chirurgica Scandinavica. Supplementum
-
Acta Chir Scand Suppl · Jan 1989
ReviewThe influence of anesthesia and postoperative analgesic management of lung function.
General anesthesia itself may influence postoperative lung function. It leads to a depression of the functional residual capacity, which, in combination with surgical trauma and postoperative pain, can provoke insufficient breathing, retention of bronchial secretions, and atelectasis. ⋯ After upper abdominal or thoracic surgery, postoperative epidural analgesia causes a significant increase of lung function as compared with systemic analgesia. The combination of regional anesthesia and general anesthesia intraoperatively appears to reduce lung function much less than general anesthesia alone.
-
Acta Chir Scand Suppl · Jan 1989
Comparative StudyCombined epidural and general anesthesia versus general anesthesia in patients having colon and rectal anastomoses.
Three retrospective studies were conducted at St. Vincent's Hospital to compare the outcomes of colorectal anastomoses, with and without resections, with respect to anesthetic technique. Operations were performed upon patients anesthetized with either combined regional (epidural) and general anesthesia (CRAG) or general anesthesia alone (GA). ⋯ Overall, anastomotic leak rates and death rates were lower in the CRAG group, and the lowest incidence of anastomotic leak was reported in the patients receiving CEA. Thus the reduced leak rate was associated more with the postoperative analgesia regimen than with the anesthetic technique. An increased incidence of wound dehiscence occurred with postoperative epidural morphine analgesia.
-
Acta Chir Scand Suppl · Jan 1989
Comparative StudyBeneficial effects on intraoperative and postoperative blood loss in total hip replacement when performed under lumbar epidural anesthesia. An explanatory study.
The effects of continuous lumbar epidural anesthesia and two types of general anesthesia on blood loss and hemodynamics during and after total hip replacement were compared in three groups of patients. Fourteen patients received local anesthetics via continuous lumbar epidural administration; 10 patients received inhalational anesthetics and breathed spontaneously after endotracheal intubation; and 14 received artificial ventilation after intubation and intermittent intravenous (i.v.) injections of pancuronium and fentanyl. The results documented that both intraoperative and postoperative blood losses were significantly reduced in patients subjected to total hip replacement under lumbar epidural anesthesia as compared with the patients receiving the two general anesthetic techniques. ⋯ Postoperatively, the hemodynamics of the general anesthesia groups were similar, and no differences in blood loss occurred. Continuous' epidural anesthesia can be viewed as a tool to achieve hypotensive anesthesia--notably on the venous side--for the purpose of minimizing blood loss. The reduction in blood loss associated with lumbar epidural anesthesia is beneficial in decreasing the hazard and cost of blood transfusion.
-
Anesthesia can have various effects on the outcome of surgery, especially gastrointestinal procedures. Many anesthetic agents, for example, produce a fall in lower esophageal sphincter pressure, which can allow reflux of gastric contents into the lower esophagus. ⋯ Anesthetic technique can affect the success of intestinal anastomosis; for example, intravenous induction agents and some inhalational anesthetics decrease regional blood flow, whereas regional anesthetics may act to increase colonic blood flow. Other aspects of anesthetic management are also discussed as they relate to surgical outcome; examples are the use of invasive monitoring in elderly patients, the importance of oxygen delivery to the anastomosis, and the effect of transfusion on survival after surgery for carcinoma.
-
Acta Chir Scand Suppl · Jan 1987
Burn mortality. Experience at a regional burn unit. Literature review.
The burn patient population at a regional burn unit in Central New York State, from 1974 through 1980, (N = 507) is described completely in terms of age, total burn size, full thickness burn size, sex, race, etiology of burn, inhalation injury, referral pattern, distance from burn unit, interval to admission, length of hospitalization and causes of death. The interrelationship of these factors is examined to define their contribution to injury severity and identify variables useful in predicting death. Demographic profiles are compared to the population base, and the case-mix of patients is contrasted with that of other burn units. ⋯ From the standpoint of public health, burn morbidity may have an economic impact far different from that of burn mortality. Supraregional burn units with access limited to seriously but not hopelessly burned individuals are proposed. Supraregional burn units would make the delivery of burn care more efficient and allow the selection of a patient sample homogeneous in terms of severity, thus increasing the reliability of treatment evaluations.