HealthcarePapers
-
To the extent possible, drug policy should be based upon good quality evidence. This must extend beyond the traditional focus on efficacy and safety in carefully selected patients, to evidence about real-world effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and safety of drugs. This paper will consider methods of improving the quality of the evidence currently available, and the implications of requiring that evidence. ⋯ This program would build on the existing passive reporting of adverse events by adding a proactive system that would systematically describe the use and impact of drugs. The notion of drug safety would be extended to include not only adverse events, but also inappropriate use of drugs that results inpatients receiving drugs that do not benefit them. Inappropriate use wastes resources and can put patients and populations at risk.
-
Comment Review
Managing healthcare costs within an integrated framework.
Laupacis, Anderson and O'Brien's comprehensive diagnosis of the illness affecting the Canadian healthcare system is very insightful. In addition, their call for improving the quality of drug evidence and outcomes is a laudable goal. However, their prognosis of the negative impact on healthcare due to escalating drug costs appears to be rather pessimistic, as they fail to view drugs within an integrated framework. ⋯ The authors' goal-oriented concept of creating a clinical milieu that encourages cost-effective prescribing via "optimum" drug use is very attractive. One such approach is Disease Management, which relies on evidence-based, outcome-oriented performance indicators. It is highly regarded for promoting effective treatment options, improving patient care and optimizing healthcare resource utilization--hence deserving serious consideration for reducing overall costs while achieving improved outcomes.
-
The Mazankowski committee considered all too familiar problems with the Alberta healthcare system, in particular expenditure inflation and public "affordability," and the efficiency of the provision of care to the population. The remedies if offers are incomplete and unconvincing because of the failure to use rigorously the evidence base. ⋯ Investment in these areas together with global budgets and equitable financial allocations offers better health for the Alberta population. Many of the Council's proposals are not consistent with the goals of expenditure control, equity and efficiency.
-
Review Case Reports
Making patients safer! Reducing error in Canadian healthcare.
Media reports of adverse events experienced by patients raise questions about whether these are isolated exceptions or part of a larger problem. There is no reliable Canadian data on medical error; but there is little reason to expect that the situation differs markedly from Australia or the United States which have rigorously studied the problem. Research in Australia has concluded that as many as 16% of hospital patients are injured as a result of their treatment. ⋯ These cultures will require a new emphasis on teamwork, a continual focus on redesigning care systems, particularly in high risk areas such as operating rooms, intensive care units and emergency rooms. These are not easy tasks and will require investments in new equipment and new skills. These steps are essential if we are to maintain public confidence in healthcare.
-
Clinicians must celebrate and study medical errors. The dark culture of blame must be replaced by a scholarly culture of safety. This commentary presents six cases that show what we can learn from errors. ⋯ Clinicians will find it difficult to undertake major safety initiatives given the existing constraints on time and energy. Although clinicians can identify the safety problems,there must also be a commitment to understand safety problems and make improvements. It is strongly recommended that hospitals train, implement and support Patient Safety Consultation Teams.