Journal of spinal disorders
-
Comparative Study
Radiographic mensuration characteristics of the sagittal lumbar spine from a normal population with a method to synthesize prior studies of lordosis.
Standing lateral lumbar radiographs of 50 normal healthy subjects were retrospectively selected for evaluation of lumbar lordosis. The objective was to evaluate, in a normal population, global and segmental contributions to lordosis in the standing position, and to devise a method to compare the seemingly unrelated multitude of lordotic values in the literature. Because of a variety of positioning and measurement methods of lordosis in live subjects and cadavers, correlation of results is difficult. ⋯ Standing lateral lumbar radiographs of 50 subjects, who had complete histories and normal examinations, were analyzed to determine overall lordosis, segmental contributions, and vertical sagittal alignment. Using posterior body tangents, the mean L1-L5 angle was -39.7 degrees, CobbT12-S1 = -65 degrees, Ferguson's sacral angle = 39 degrees, pelvic tilt angle was 49 degrees, and average RRAs (segmental angles) were RRAT12-L1 = -3.6 degrees, RRAL1-L2 = -4.1 degrees, RRAL2-L3 = -7.6 degrees, RRAL3-L4 = -11.7 degrees, RRAL4-L5 = -16.8 degrees, and RRAL5-S1 = -32.4 degrees. Using segmental rotation angles as a method to compare past and current literature, a normal standing lumbar lordosis of CobbT12-S1 = -61 degrees, range -55 degrees to -65 degrees, was determined with specific segmental angles.
-
Review Case Reports
Traumatic bilateral rotatory dislocation of the atlanto-axial joints: a case report and review of the literature.
Traumatic bilateral rotatory dislocation at the atlanto-axial joints is a rare injury in adults. Only three prior cases have been reported (1,2,3). Our case report, review of management, and pathophysiology from the literature is presented. This injury may be successfully treated by closed reduction and brace immobilization.
-
A prospective study was performed in obese and nonobese patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery to report perioperative data and surgical outcomes. One hundred fifty-nine consecutive patients who underwent lumbar spine surgery by a single surgeon entered the study. Among 159 consecutive patients, 55 met the criteria for obesity (> 20% ideal body weight). ⋯ This study found no significant differences between obese and control patients relative to blood loss, operative time, hospital stay, rate of complications, and functional outcome in lumbar spine surgery. Patient selection continues to be the most important factor in terms of operative success. We believe that lumbar spine surgery, including fusion, should not be withheld from obese patients who present with proper indications for surgery and fail an appropriate course of conservative treatment.
-
Anterior spinal fusion (ASF) has been proven to improve curve correction, save motion segments, and decrease the rate of pseudarthrosis when compared with posterior spinal fusion alone. However, in patients with idiopathic scoliosis, the complication rate of the anterior approach to the spine using current techniques has only been scantly defined in the literature. This is a retrospective review of consecutive patients who underwent primary ASF for idiopathic scoliosis to determine the prevalence and types of complications specifically related to the anterior approach. ⋯ The anterior approach to the spine in patients with idiopathic scoliosis in this series was very safe, with only one major complication in 98 patients. However, minor and insignificant complications were quite common, occurring in 45 of 98 patients (46%). Smoking was a significant risk factor for minor complications.
-
Epidural steroid therapy is a commonly applied "conservative" therapy, but it is not inherently benign. Although arachnoiditis, infection, and meningitis have been reported, acute paraplegia has not been reported as a complication of either caudal or spinal epidural steroid injection. A unique case of transient, profound paralysis after epidural steroid injection is reported here. ⋯ Although pathologic confirmation of the cause was not possible, the potential for this alarming complication should be recognized by physicians prescribing epidural steroid therapy. We do not suggest that epidural steroid therapy is the treatment of choice for patients with multiple back operations or that it is efficacious for these patients. Our purpose is to alert surgeons and therapists to a rare but potentially devastating complication and to provide our experience in treating it.