The journal of clinical hypertension
-
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) · Jan 2003
Meta AnalysisBenefits of antihypertensive pharmacologic therapy and blood pressure reduction in outcome trials.
In a quantitative overview of published trials, we investigated whether pharmacologic properties of antihypertensive drugs, as opposed to reduction in blood pressure, explain cardiovascular outcomes in hypertensive or high-risk patients. We used meta-regression to investigate the association between the odds ratios of outcome (experimental vs. reference treatment) and the corresponding blood pressure differences between study groups. Thus, we correlated odds ratios with between-group differences in systolic pressure. ⋯ In PROGRESS, perindopril alone reduced blood pressure by 5/3 mm Hg, but did not affect the incidence of all cardiovascular events or the recurrence of stroke. In conclusion, the finding that in the reviewed trials blood pressure reduction largely accounted for outcome emphasizes the desirability of tight blood pressure control. The hypothesis that blood pressure-lowering medications might influence cardiovascular prognosis over and beyond their antihypertensive effect remains to a large extent unproved.
-
Hypertension is an important, modifiable risk for cardiovascular disease. The Women Take Heart study, a prospective, community-based cohort study of risk factors for heart disease, provides an opportunity to examine prevalence, awareness, and control of hypertension specifically in women. In 1992, 5932 women, age 35 and older (mean age, 52.9; 86% white, 9% African American, 5% other) and free of active heart disease symptoms for 3 months, were recruited through Chicago area public announcements, and their baseline examination data analyzed. ⋯ Only 17.3% reported being hypertensive; in 63.2% of all hypertensive women, the hypertension was undetected or unacknowledged. Blood pressure was controlled to <140/90 mm Hg in 24.1% of self-reported hypertensives. Results from this study and national surveys indicate that hypertension detection and control remain major public health challenges in preventing cardiovascular disease in older women.
-
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) · Nov 2002
ReviewClinical impact of renin-angiotensin system blockade: angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors vs. angiotensin receptor antagonists.
Clinical trials have proved that blockade of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) offers primary and secondary protection of the cardiovascular system, brain, and kidneys. Drugs that interrupt the RAAS do so by several diverse mechanisms but it remains to be fully proved whether these mechanistic differences are associated with meaningful differences in clinical outcomes. This review summarizes current information about the basic mechanisms of action of three classes of anti-RAAS drugs: angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, combined ACE-neutral endopeptidase inhibitors, and angiotensin receptor antagonists as well as results of major clinical outcome trials with these agents. Basic and clinical science information is then blended with insights from the clinical pharmacology of anti-RAAS drugs to address four current controversies in clinical medicine: whether ACE inhibitors and angiotensin receptor antagonists are interchangeable, optimal dosing of available agents, potential justification of ACE inhibitor/angiotensin receptor antagonist combinations, and first-line use of anti-RAAS drugs in antihypertensive therapy.