Hematology
-
Patients with severe thrombocytopenia are presumed to be at increased risk for bleeding, and consequently it has been standard practice for the past four decades to give allogeneic platelet transfusions to severely thrombocytopenic patients as supportive care. Platelet transfusions may be given either prophylactically to reduce the risk of bleeding, in the absence of clinical hemorrhage (prophylactic transfusions), or to control active bleeding when present (therapeutic transfusions). While no one would argue with the need for platelet transfusions in the face of severe bleeding, important questions remain about what constitutes clinically significant bleeding and whether a strategy of prophylactic platelet transfusions is effective in reducing the risk of bleeding in clinically stable patients. ⋯ At least two RCTs evaluating the relative value of prophylactic versus therapeutic platelet transfusions have been initiated in thrombocytopenic patients with hematological malignancies. One such study, known as the TOPPS (Trial of Prophylactic Platelets Study) study, is currently underway in the U. K.
-
Unexpectedly elevated INR values are commonly encountered in clinical practice. In the absence of bleeding, such values may be treated with either simple warfarin withdrawal or the administration of low doses of oral vitamin K. Oral vitamin K will more rapidly return the INR to the therapeutic reference interval; however, its impact on bleeding is unknown. ⋯ Coagulation factor replacement is required given the need to urgently correct the INR; however, vitamin K should not be forgotten since it is required to antagonize the effect of warfarin, preventing "rebound" anticoagulation after transfused coagulation factors are consumed. This paper will review the evidence supporting various treatment modalities and will provide suggestions for treatment. Future advances in this area will likely focus on evaluations of the relative merits of FFP and PCCs.