Epilepsy & behavior : E&B
-
Epilepsy & behavior : E&B · Oct 2015
Review Meta AnalysisFamily communication in the context of pediatric epilepsy: A systematic review.
In childhood chronic illness, family communication can impact the child's and parents' psychosocial well-being. However, little is known about family communication in the context of epilepsy in childhood. The aim of this systematic review was to identify the existing evidence available on communication strategies adopted by families living with childhood epilepsy, including; the facilitators, barriers and challenges experienced by families when choosing to communicate, or not, about epilepsy; and the consequences of this communication. ⋯ The main barrier to communication for parents was an unwillingness to use the word "epilepsy" because of the perceived negative social connotations associated with the health condition. For children with epilepsy, barriers were as follows: parental desire to keep epilepsy a secret, parents' tendency to deny that the child had epilepsy, parental overprotection, and parents' tendency to impose greater restrictions on the child with epilepsy than on siblings without epilepsy. Future research investigating the communication strategies of families living with epilepsy is needed in order to create effective communication-based interventions for discussing epilepsy within the home.
-
Epilepsy & behavior : E&B · Aug 2015
Review Meta Analysis Comparative StudyNonintravenous midazolam versus intravenous or rectal diazepam for the treatment of early status epilepticus: A systematic review with meta-analysis.
Prompt treatment of status epilepticus (SE) is associated with better outcomes. Rectal diazepam (DZP) and nonintravenous (non-IV) midazolam (MDZ) are often used in the treatment of early SE instead of intravenous applications. The aim of this review was to determine if nonintravenous MDZ is as effective and safe as intravenous or rectal DZP in terminating early SE seizures in children and adults. ⋯ Non-IV MDZ is as effective and safe as intravenous or rectal DZP in terminating early SE in children and probably also in adults. Times from arrival in the emergency department to drug administration and to seizure cessation are shorter with non-IV MDZ than with intravenous or rectal DZP, but this does not necessarily result in higher seizure control. An exception may be the buccal MDZ, which, besides being socially more acceptable and easier to administer, might also have a higher efficacy than rectal DZP in seizure control. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled Status Epilepticus.
-
Epilepsy & behavior : E&B · Jan 2010
Meta AnalysisPlacebo responses in randomized trials of antiepileptic drugs.
This meta-analysis of published, randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) of antiepileptic drugs in adults with focal drug-resistant epilepsy was performed to estimate a mean placebo effect, to evaluate variability in placebo response rates, to investigate associations between placebo effect rates and study characteristics, and to determine whether there were changes in placebo response rates over recent years in RCTs (so-called "placebo drift"). One hundred ninety-eight potentially appropriate studies were identified after MEDLINE search and carefully reviewed. ⋯ A random effects meta-analytic model estimated the pooled placebo response at 12.5% (95% CI: 10.03-14.94%). A statistically significant correlation between baseline median seizure frequency and placebo response rates was not observed. "Placebo drift" was not considered statistically significant.