Clinical lung cancer
-
Clinical lung cancer · Nov 2004
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Clinical TrialClinical benefit of zoledronic acid in patients with lung cancer and other solid tumors: analysis based on history of skeletal complications.
The results of a retrospective exploratory analysis of a phase III trial of zoledronic acid in patients with bone metastases secondary to lung cancer or other solid tumors are reported herein to assess the risk of skeletal-related events (SREs) and the efficacy of 4 mg zoledronic acid compared with placebo. The study is based on patient SRE history before study entry. Patients were stratified based on SRE history (eg, pathologic fracture, spinal cord compression, radiation therapy or surgery to bone, or hypercalcemia) before study entry, and SRE incidence over 21 months was analyzed. ⋯ Among patients with an SRE before study entry, zoledronic acid reduced the risk of SREs by 31% (P = 0.009), reduced the mean skeletal morbidity rate (1.96 vs. 2.81 SREs per year for placebo; P = 0.030), and prolonged the median time to first SRE by nearly 4 months (215 days vs. 106 days for placebo; P = 0.011). Among patients with no SRE before study entry (n = 156), zoledronic acid reduced the risk of SREs by 23% (P = 0.308), reduced the mean skeletal morbidity rate (1.34 vs. 2.53 SREs per year for placebo; P = 0.332), and prolonged the median time to first SRE by 2.5 months (P = 0.534). This exploratory analysis demonstrates that patients with a history of SREs are at high risk for subsequent SREs, but zoledronic acid reduces skeletal morbidity regardless of SRE history.
-
Surgical resection of early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains the standard of care in patients fit for surgery. Careful preoperative staging is imperative, as is pathologic documentation of the mediastinal nodal contents. Adjuvant postoperative thoracic radiation therapy (RT) clearly has an impact in reducing locoregional recurrence but has no clear impact on survival. ⋯ The use of adjuvant cisplatin-based therapy did not show a survival advantage in the Adjuvant Lung Project Italy study but did in the International Adjuvant Lung Trial, creating controversy in the routine implementation of adjuvant therapy in all patients. Recently completed randomized trials by the Cancer and Leukemia Group B and the National Cancer Institute of Canada provide convincing evidence of a substantial benefit from adjuvant therapy in well-staged and completely resected stage I/II NSCLC. Currently, the totality of the data supports a discussion with patients with resected NSCLC regarding the potential benefits of adjuvant therapy.
-
Clinical lung cancer · Sep 2004
ReviewEarly-stage non-small-cell lung cancer: current perspectives in combined-modality therapy.
The most effective treatment for patients with early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains complete surgical resection, providing the disease is medically operable and adequately staged. The effectiveness of surgical resection, however, is limited by high rates of distant recurrence caused by the presence of metastatic disease that is not apparent at the time of surgery. Thus, induction, adjuvant chemotherapy, and radiation therapy, as well as a combination of both, have been studied for their ability to reduce local and distant recurrence rates and to improve survival. ⋯ A number of clinical trials have shown that induction chemotherapy is safe and feasible, with no significant increase in surgical complications, and results in favorable survival rates in patients with resectable NSCLC. A number of phase III randomized trials are currently under way to confirm the benefits of induction chemotherapy in patients with stage IB-IIIA NSCLC and to compare induction chemotherapy versus adjuvant chemotherapy following surgery versus surgery alone. In addition, biologically targeted agents are currently under study for patients with advanced NSCLC.