The journal of pain : official journal of the American Pain Society
-
Previous research indicates that exposure to shock decreases thermal pain sensitivity in humans. This hypoalgesia has been attributed to a centrally mediated fear state that activates descending inhibitory pathways. Animal research suggests that distraction alters the activation of these hypoalgesic systems. To determine whether the pain memory alters the activation of hypoalgesic systems in humans, the present study examined whether a post-shock distractor attenuates shock-induced hypoalgesia. If fear-inducing shocks are represented by a limited capacity working memory system, then a distractor should speed the decay of the hypoalgesia. Healthy men were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 groups: shock-distraction, shock-no distraction, no shock-distraction, and no shock-no distraction. Following baseline pain tests, participants in the shock groups were presented with 3 brief shocks. Immediately following shock, an unexpected vibration stimulus was presented to participants in the distraction groups. Both self-report and physiological (SCL, HR) measures indicated that shock exposure resulted in fear, arousal, and decreased pain sensitivity. Consistent with prior animal studies, presentation of a post-shock distractor sped the decay of shock-induced hypoalgesia. Specifically, the distraction group exhibited significantly less shock-induced hypoalgesia compared to the no-distraction group. These findings provide additional evidence for the involvement of memory processes in the activation of descending pain inhibitory pathways. ⋯ This study demonstrated that the presentation of a distracting stimulus immediately following 3 brief shocks attenuated shock-induced hypoalgesia in healthy human subjects. Understanding the impact of post-pain distraction on pain processing may have important clinical implications because it may influence patients' willingness to undergo future painful medical procedures.
-
This observational study aimed to determine whether pain sensitivity in patients with noncancer chronic pain, taking either methadone or morphine, is similar to patients maintained on methadone for dependence therapy, compared with a control group. Nociceptive thresholds were measured on a single occasion with von Frey hairs, electrical stimulation, and cold pressor tests. In all subjects receiving methadone or morphine, nociceptive testing occurred just before a scheduled dose. Cold pressor tolerance values in patients with noncancer, chronic pain, treated with morphine and methadone, were 18.1 +/- 2.6 seconds (mean +/- SEM) and 19.7 +/- 2.3 seconds, respectively; in methadone-maintained subjects it was 18.9 +/- 1.9 seconds, with all values being significantly (P < .05) lower than opioid-naïve subjects (30.7 +/- 3.9 seconds). These results indicate that patients with chronic pain managed with opioids and methadone-maintained subjects are hyperalgesic when assessed by the cold pressor test but not by the electrical stimulation test. None of the groups exhibited allodynia as measured using the von Frey hairs. These results add to the growing body of evidence that chronic opioid exposure increases sensitivity to some types of pain. They also demonstrate that in humans, this hyperalgesia is not associated with allodynia. ⋯ This article presents an observational study whereby the pain sensitivity of patients with chronic pain managed with opioids and opioid-maintained patients were compared with opioid-naïve patients. The results suggest that opioid use may contribute to an increase in the sensitivity to certain pain experimental stimuli.
-
There is evidence that pain patients demonstrate attentional biases toward some pain-related stimuli (eg, sensory words) and not others (eg, affective words). However, whether individuals in chronic pain caused by rheumatoid arthritis (RA) also demonstrate this bias has not been investigated. Further, within the pain literature, whether these biases reflect hypervigilance or difficulty disengaging from stimuli remains contentious. The present study aimed to determine (a) whether RA patients demonstrate an attentional bias to sensory pain words; and (b) whether this bias is a result of hypervigilance or failure to disengage from the stimuli. RA patients showed a bias toward sensory words and away from threat-related words. The effect for sensory words resulted from slowed performance on incongruent trials (ie, difficulty disengaging), whereas the bias away from threat words resulted from faster responses on incongruent trials (ie, avoidance of threat). The pattern of attention biases in RA patients is very similar to those found in patients with chronic pain. At least in RA, attentional biases appear to be related to a failure to disengage from pain-related words rather than hypervigilance. ⋯ There is continued debate about whether these biases are caused by hypervigilance toward pain stimuli or difficulty disengaging from pain stimuli. This study shows that in a group of RA patients, attentional biases toward pain are caused by difficulty disengaging rather than hypervigilance.
-
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of smoking status after a diagnosis of lung cancer on reported pain levels. We conducted a telephone survey of patients with lung cancer identified from 4 participating sites between September 2004 and July 2006. Patients were asked to rate their usual pain level over the past week on a 0 to 10 rating scale on which 0 was "no pain" and 10 "pain as bad as you can imagine." We operationally defined persistent smokers as patients who reported continuing to smoke after their lung cancer diagnosis. A logistic regression analysis was used to test the hypothesis that persistent smokers report higher usual pain levels than nonsmokers. Overall, 893 patients completed the survey. The majority (76%) was found to have advanced cancer (stages IIIb and IV). The mean age was 63 years (SD = 10). Seventeen percent of the patients studied were categorized as persistent smokers. The mean pain score for the study sample was 3.1 (SD = 2.7) and 41% reported moderate (4 to 6) or severe pain (7 to 10). A greater proportion of persistent smokers reported moderate or severe pain than nonsmokers or former smokers (P < .001). Logistic regression analysis revealed that smoking status was associated with the usual pain even after adjusting for age, perceived health status, and other lung cancer symptoms such as dyspnea, fatigue, and trouble eating. In conclusion, patients who continue to smoke after a diagnosis of lung cancer report higher levels of usual pain than nonsmokers or former smokers. More research is needed to understand the mechanisms that relate nicotine intake to pain and disease progression in late-stage lung cancer. ⋯ This article examines the relationship between pain and persistent smoking in patients with lung cancer. Although more research is needed to understand the mechanisms that relate nicotine intake to pain and disease progression, physicians can promote smoking cessation in patients with lung cancer to improve health and quality of life.
-
Although intrathecal (i.t.) administration of the alpha(2)-adrenoceptor agonist clonidine has a pronounced analgesic effect, the clinical use of clonidine is limited by its side effects. Previously, our laboratory has demonstrated that the subcutaneous injection of diluted bee venom (DBV) into an acupoint (termed apipuncture) produces significant analgesic effect in various pain animal models. The present study was designed to examine whether DBV injection into the Zusanli acupoint (ST-36) could enhance lower-dose clonidine-induced analgesic effects without the development of hypotension, bradycardia, or sedation. In the mouse formalin test, DBV injection produced a dramatic leftward shift in the dose-response curve for clonidine-induced analgesia. In a rat neuropathic pain model i.t. clonidine dose dependently suppressed chronic constriction injury (CCI)-induced mechanical allodynia and thermal hyperalgesia, and this clonidine-induced analgesic effect was significantly potentiated by apipuncture pretreatment. DBV apipuncture alone or in combination with a low dose of i.t. clonidine produced an analgesic effect similar to that of the high dose of clonidine, but without significant side effects. The analgesic effect produced by the combination of i.t. clonidine and apipuncture was completely blocked by pretreatment with an alpha(2)-adrenoceptor antagonist. These data show that DBV-apipuncture significantly enhances clonidine-induced analgesia and suggest that a combination of low dose clonidine with acupuncture therapy represents a novel strategy for pain management that could eliminates clonidine's side effects. ⋯ This study demonstrated that intrathecal clonidine-induced analgesia is significantly enhanced when it is combined with chemical acupuncture treatment. The administration of low-dose clonidine in combination with acupuncture produced a potent analgesic effect without significant side effects and thus represents a potential novel strategy for the management of chronic pain.