The journal of pain : official journal of the American Pain Society
-
Evaluating pain in verbal children in the hospital setting is done primarily through serial assessments of pain intensity using single-item measures. However, little remains known about intensity scales' relative responsiveness and uniqueness from negative affect in this clinical setting. In the present study, a total of 411 assessments using 3 common pediatric pain intensity measures (the Faces Pain Scale-Revised, a verbally presented numeric rating scale, and a visual analog scale) were obtained over a period of 3 days from 29 children ages 9 to 18 years following a relatively standardized surgical procedure. Hierarchical linear models were used to compare the 3 scales on responsiveness over postoperative recovery time, invariance across baseline variables (age, sex, and baseline mood), and distinctiveness from changes in negative affect. Results showed that all 3 pain-intensity measures were highly interrelated, varied similarly with age and baseline state anxiety, and were comparably related to contemporaneous changes in affect. However, patients tended to rate pain intensity higher on the Numerical Rating Scale, and only this scale failed to reflect a decreasing trend in pain scores with elapsed surgical recovery time. Potential implications for clinical practice are discussed. ⋯ This article presents data comparing the responsiveness over time and association with negative affect of 3 single-item pediatric pain-intensity scales commonly used in hospital settings. The results can help inform the selection of self-report measures when serially evaluating pain and treatment response in hospitalized children.
-
Research has largely ignored the systematic examination of physicians' attitudes towards providing care for patients with chronic noncancer pain. The objective of this study was to identify barriers and facilitators to opioid treatment of chronic noncancer pain patients by office-based medical providers. We used a qualitative study design using individual and group interviews. Participants were 23 office-based physicians in New England. Interviews were audiotaped, transcribed, and systematically coded by a multidisciplinary team using the constant comparative method. Physician barriers included absence of objective or physiological measures of pain; lack of expertise in the treatment of chronic pain and coexisting disorders, including addiction; lack of interest in pain management; patients' aberrant behaviors; and physicians' attitudes toward prescribing opioid analgesics. Physician facilitators included promoting continuity of patient care and the use of opioid agreements. Physicians' perceptions of patient-related barriers included lack of physician responsiveness to patients' pain reports, negative attitudes toward opioid analgesics, concerns about cost, and patients' low motivation for pain treatment. Perceived logistical barriers included lack of appropriate pain management and addiction referral options, limited information regarding diagnostic workup, limited insurance coverage for pain management services, limited ancillary support for physicians, and insufficient time. Addressing these barriers to pain treatment will be crucial to improving pain management service delivery. ⋯ This article demonstrates that perceived barriers to treating patients with chronic noncancer pain are common among office-based physicians. Addressing these barriers in physician training and in existing office-based programs might benefit both noncancer chronic pain patients and their medical providers.
-
Because fibromyalgia (FM) patients frequently report activity-dependent deep tissue pains, impulse input from painful body regions may be relevant for their musculoskeletal complaints. In addition, peripheral impulse input may induce and maintain thermal and mechanical hyperalgesia of FM patients. If so, activity and rest may alternately enhance and diminish intensity of FM pain. However, the effects of exercise on pain are ambiguous in studies of FM. Whereas exercise-only studies demonstrated increased pain and hyperalgesia during and after physical activity, some exercise studies that included rest periods resulted in decreased FM pain and increased function. To further clarify these effects, we examined the effects of alternating exercise with rest on clinical pain and thermal/mechanical hyperalgesia of 34 FM patients and 36 age-matched healthy controls (NC). Using an ergometer, all subjects performed arm exercise to exhaustion twice alternating with 15-minute rest periods. Although strenuous muscle activity was reported as painful by most FM subjects, overall clinical pain consistently decreased during the rest periods. Additionally, FM subjects' pain sensitivity to mechanical pressure decreased after each exercise and rest session. ⋯ FM is a pain-amplification syndrome that depends at least in part on peripheral tissue impulse input. Whereas muscle activity increased overall pain, short rest periods produced analgesic effects.
-
Sex differences in the processing and experience of emotion exist. The present study examined whether sex differences in emotion lead to sex differences in affective modulation of pain and spinal nociception (assessed by nociceptive flexion reflex, NFR). Participants were healthy men (n = 47) and women (n = 73). Prior to affective modulation testing, electrocutaneous pain sensitivity was assessed (NFR threshold, pain threshold, pain tolerance). Affective modulation of pain and NFR was then assessed by presenting pictures that vary in emotional valence and arousal (mutilation, attack, death, neutral, families, adventure, erotica) during which suprathreshold electrocutaneous stimulations were delivered. Subjective emotional reactions were assessed after every picture, and nociceptive reactions were assessed after every suprathreshold stimulus. Results indicated women had greater pain sensitivity and also responded more negatively to attack pictures and less positively to erotic pictures. But despite these differences, affective modulation of pain/NFR was not moderated by sex: erotic pictures inhibited pain/NFR and mutilation pictures enhanced pain/NFR. Together, this implies subjective emotional experience does not completely mediate picture-evoked modulation of pain/NFR, a supposition that was further supported by exploratory analyses that demonstrated picture-evoked modulation of pain/NFR was present even after controlling for intra- and inter-individual differences in emotional reactions to pictures. Implications and limitations of these findings are discussed. ⋯ Evidence suggests that women are more sensitive to experimental and clinical pain, but the mechanisms contributing to these sex differences are poorly understood. Affective processes are known to play a role in regulating pain signaling and pain experience; therefore, the present study examined whether sex differences in affective experience contribute to sex differences in pain. Results indicate that in healthy individuals affective processes may not contribute to sex differences in pain.
-
Few data have been available on the functional role of small fiber damage in patients with peripheral nerve injuries with and without spontaneous pain. The aim of the present study was to investigate the function of large myelinated nerve fibers as well as small nerve fibers in a material of 60 patients with peripheral nerve injuries in upper or lower extremities, 30 patients with spontaneous pain, and 30 patients without pain. Patients were questioned about the characteristics of pain and investigated clinically with EMG/neurography and assessment of thermal thresholds in the innervation territory of the lesioned nerve as well as in the contralateral area. Sensation of touch and warmth and cold detection was significantly reduced in the injured side in both groups. There was a tendency, not significant, for heat pain thresholds to be more elevated in the affected side compared with the healthy side in the pain group only (47.8°C versus 45.1°C). There were no significant differences in thermal thresholds between the 2 groups of patients. The main finding was a high percentage of hyperphenomena (allodynia to light touch and reduced mechanical pain thresholds) in the pain group only. ⋯ Small fiber function did not significantly differ between patients with and without pain, indicating that elevated thermal thresholds alone will not reflect mechanisms responsible for the generation of pain. Hyperphenomena were present in the affected side of the pain group only.