The journal of pain : official journal of the American Pain Society
-
Randomized Controlled Trial
An explanatory study evaluating the muscle relaxant effects of intramuscular magnesium sulphate for dystonia in complex regional pain syndrome.
The treatment of dystonia related to complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) remains unsatisfactory, raising the need of alternative targets for intervention. In dystonia, pathologic muscle changes may occur, which contributes to stiffness. Because magnesium sulphate may act as a muscle relaxant through its actions on the neuromuscular junction and muscle, we performed an explanatory study of the muscle relaxant effect and safety of intramuscular magnesium sulphate (IMMG) in CRPS patients with dystonia. In a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled crossover study, 30 patients were assigned to 3-week treatments of IMMG and placebo. Treatments were separated by a 1-week washout period. The daily dose of IMMG was 1,000 mg in week 1, 1,500 mg in week 2, and 2,000 mg in week 3. The primary outcome measure was the difference in change in Burke-Fahn-Marsden scores after 3 weeks of treatment between both interventions. Secondary outcomes involved severity of dystonia, myoclonus, tremor, and pain, and functional activity. Data of 22 patients available for the explanatory analysis revealed no significant differences between IMMG and placebo treatment in any of the outcomes. In conclusion, we found no indication of efficacy of IMMG in a daily dose of 2,000 mg as a muscle relaxant in CRPS-related dystonia. ⋯ In this double-blind placebo-controlled crossover study there was no evidence found of a muscle relaxant effect of intramuscular magnesium sulphate in dystonia related to CRPS. Consequently, there is insufficient support for new studies evaluating the efficacy of other routes of MG administration in CRPS-related dystonia.
-
Pain is ultimately a perceptual phenomenon. It is built from information gathered by specialized pain receptors in tissue, modified by spinal and supraspinal mechanisms, and integrated into a discrete sensory experience with an emotional valence in the brain. Because of this, studying intact animals allows the multidimensional nature of pain to be examined. A number of animal models have been developed, reflecting observations that pain phenotypes are mediated by distinct mechanisms. Animal models of pain are designed to mimic distinct clinical diseases to better evaluate underlying mechanisms and potential treatments. Outcome measures are designed to measure multiple parts of the pain experience, including reflexive hyperalgesia measures, sensory and affective dimensions of pain, and impact of pain on function and quality of life. In this review, we discuss the common methods used for inducing each of the pain phenotypes related to clinical pain syndromes as well as the main behavioral tests for assessing pain in each model. ⋯ Understanding animal models and outcome measures in animals will assist in translating data from basic science to the clinic.
-
Despite the high prevalence of neck pain among women, menstrual effects on regional pain outcomes have not been investigated in this clinical population. This study evaluated menstrual effects on mechanical pain sensitivity (pressure pain threshold [PPT]), neck pain intensity (numeric pain rating scale [NPRS]), and neck-related disability (Neck Disability Index [NDI]) in 22 normally menstruating (NM) and 17 hormonal contraceptive users with chronic neck pain. Sex hormones, PPT, and NDI were measured during the early follicular (F1), late follicular (F2), and luteal (L) menstrual phases. Daily NPRS scores were recorded in an online symptom diary and averaged within each phase. Estradiol and progesterone increased only for NM women in F2 and L, respectively. Phase effects on PPT (η(2) = .003), NDI (η(2) = .003), and NPRS (η(2) = .016) for NM women were small and did not differ from those for the hormonal contraceptive users (P ≥ .386). Averaged across the menstrual cycle, PPT scores explained 29% of the variance in NPRS scores for NM women but were not associated with NDI scores in either group. Results indicate that the magnitude of menstrual effects on mechanical pain sensitivity and the severity of neck pain and disability do not exceed thresholds of clinically detectable change in women with chronic neck pain. ⋯ Fluctuations in evoked and clinical pain outcomes across the menstrual cycle do not appear to be of sufficient magnitude to impact clinical decision making for women with chronic neck pain.
-
Somatic symptoms experienced by women with a menstrually related mood disorder (MRMD) during their premenstrual luteal phase contribute to functional impairment. Yet, investigations on pathophysiological mechanisms contributing to heightened pain sensitivity in MRMD are sparse. During the luteal phase, 61 women with an MRMD and 61 non-MRMD controls were evaluated for β-adrenergic receptor (β-AR) responsivity using the isoproterenol sensitivity test. A subset (43 MRMD and 50 non-MRMD) then entered a double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover protocol to examine the effect of β-AR blockade with intravenous propranolol on sensitivity to experimental (cold pressor and ischemic) and clinical (McGill Pain Questionnaire score) pain. Women with an MRMD exhibited greater β1- and β2-AR responsivity, ischemic pain intensity, and affective clinical pain ratings than controls. Propranolol increased cold pressor pain tolerance in both groups, but it decreased cold pain intensity and ischemic pain unpleasantness ratings only in non-MRMD women. In contrast, propranolol decreased affective ratings of clinical pain in women with MRMD. Exploratory analyses indicated that only in MRMD women did greater β-AR responsivity predict greater sensitivity to cold pressor and ischemic pain. This study provides the first evidence for a role of β-AR mechanisms in the hyperalgesia and clinical pain experienced by women with MRMDs. ⋯ This article describes the effects of β-adrenergic receptor stimulation and blockade on experimental and clinical pain sensitivity in women with an MRMD. The results of this study may have implications for the management of the substantial somatic premenstrual symptomatology experienced by women with an MRMD.
-
Vicarious pain has been shown to enhance observers' nociceptive reactivity and pain perception. We exposed healthy participants to specific parts of facial pain expressions in order to investigate which components are required to induce this modulation. We created 2 classes of stimuli: one containing the most useful information for identification of pain expressions (diagnostic) and one containing the least useful information (antidiagnostic). Twenty-eight normal volunteers received electrical stimulation of the sural nerve immediately after they viewed these stimuli. Subjective ratings (intensity and unpleasantness) as well as the nociceptive flexion reflex (NFR) evoked by the shock were recorded. Results show that diagnostic stimuli lead to higher subjective ratings of shock pain than the antidiagnostic stimuli, but the stimuli classes had no significant impact on the NFR. A control experiment showed that our facial stimuli were given very low valence and arousal ratings compared to stimuli previously used to demonstrate the effect of emotional pictures on pain. Thus, the results are unlikely to be explained by emotions felt by the observer and suggest a vicarious facilitation of supraspinal pain processing induced by key features underlying pain expressions recognition. Results provide further support to the perception-action model of empathy. ⋯ This study demonstrates that visual features that are efficiently used for the recognition of pain expressions are sufficient to induce a vicarious facilitation of self-pain. Supraspinal pain responses were modulated by the informativeness of the areas of the pain expressions that participants viewed prior to the painful stimulations.