The journal of pain : official journal of the American Pain Society
-
Observational Study
A novel finger illusion reveals reduced weighting of bimanual hand cortical representations in people with complex regional pain syndrome.
Complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) is associated with deficits in sensorimotor control. Herein we have used a novel finger illusion to investigate whether CRPS is associated with reduced weighting of bimanual hand representations. The illusion normally induces a compelling feeling that the hands are close together when in fact they are 12 cm apart. ⋯ We suggest the results have clear clinical and research implications. PERSPECTIVE: An abnormal weighting of bilateral hand representation may reflect a vulnerability for chronic CRPS, an adaptation to the disease, and/or a potential therapeutic target. That addition of cutaneous input immediately normalizes the problem points to the possible role of bimanual tasks in prevention or rehabilitation.
-
Optimism is associated with lower pain sensitivity, positive adjustment to chronic pain, and greater reduction of pain thresholds in a conditioned pain modulation (CPM) paradigm. We hypothesized that participants with higher levels of optimism would experience greater inhibition of suprathreshold pain during CPM. Seventy-seven healthy adults completed a test of optimism, the Life Orientation Test-Revised, as well as measures of depression, pain catastrophizing, and neuroticism. ⋯ This unexpected finding may be due to factors such as perceived stress and coping differences, and suggests that modulation of threshold-level and suprathreshold pain involves different underlying mechanisms. PERSPECTIVE: This article reports that greater optimism predicts less inhibition of suprathreshold pain, in contrast with previous work showing that optimism correlates positively with pain threshold reductions. These findings suggest that the association between optimism and the function of endogenous pain modulatory systems is complex and differs for threshold-level and suprathreshold pain.
-
Despite widespread use as a chronic pain management strategy, pacing has been linked with higher levels of pain and disability. A recent meta-analysis found a positive correlation between existing measures of pacing and avoidance, which may partially account for these poorer outcomes. A measure was developed to differentiate pacing from avoidance by emphasizing non-pain-contingent pacing behaviors and nonavoidance of pain. ⋯ PERSPECTIVE: The NAPS assesses activity pacing in chronic pain without artefactual overlap with avoidance. Associations were found between more frequent pacing, as measured by the NAPS, and better psychological functioning. Clearly differentiating pacing from avoidance allows for accurate assessment of the role of pacing in chronic pain management.
-
The multidimensional nature of chronic pain is not reflected by definitions based solely on pain duration, resulting in high prevalence estimates limiting effective policy development. The newly proposed concept of high-impact chronic pain (HICP) incorporates both disability and pain duration to identify a more severely impacted portion of the chronic pain population yet remains uncharacterized at the population level. As such, we used the 2011 National Health Interview Survey (N = 15,670) to 1) assess the likelihood of disability in the overall chronic pain population, 2) estimate the prevalence of HICP, and 3) characterize the disability, health status, and health care use profile of this population in the United States. ⋯ Understanding this heterogeneity will contribute to developing more effective legislation promoting safe and cost-effective approaches to the prevention and treatment of chronic pain. PERSPECTIVE: HICP is a powerful new classification that differentiates those with debilitating chronic pain from those with less impactful chronic pain. By addressing the multidimensionality of chronic pain, this classification will improve clinical practice, research, and the development of effective health policy.
-
Review Meta Analysis
Do People With Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain Have Impaired Motor Imagery? A Meta-analytical Systematic Review of the Left/Right Judgment Task.
The left/right judgment task (LRJT) is the most commonly used method of assessing motor imagery performance. Abnormally long response times are thought to reflect delayed processing of body/spatial representations, and poor accuracy is thought to reflect disrupted cortical proprioceptive representations or body schema. Slower and less accurate responses on the LRJT have been reported in a variety of chronic musculoskeletal pain conditions. ⋯ PERSPECTIVES: This review synthesizes evidence of altered motor imagery performance using the LRJT across chronic musculoskeletal pain conditions. Consistent evidence was found for altered motor imagery performance in peripheral pain conditions, but evidence was less consistent for axial conditions. Treatment to restore a normal body schema may be beneficial in chronic limb and facial pain.