The journal of pain : official journal of the American Pain Society
-
Review Meta Analysis Comparative Study
A Comparative Meta-Analysis of Unidisciplinary Psychology and Interdisciplinary Treatment Outcomes Following Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for Adults with Chronic Pain.
While much of the literature provides positive support for psychological interventions for chronic pain, 2 recent meta-analyses indicate small to moderate benefits only. This inconsistency in findings suggests that there are other treatment-related variables to consider. One possible consideration pertains to treatment format, as psychological models form the basis for both unidisciplinary psychology and integrated interdisciplinary treatments for chronic pain. ⋯ PERSPECTIVE: A comparative meta-analysis examined the relative ES of unidisciplinary (ie, clinical psychology only) and interdisciplinary ACT for chronic pain in 29 studies. The ES for interdisciplinary ACT was larger than unidisciplinary ACT for physical disability, psychosocial impact, and depression. No differences were present for pain intensity, anxiety, and acceptance.
-
Conditioned pain modulation (CPM) is a potentially useful biomarker in pain populations; however, a statistically robust interpretation of change scores is required. Currently, reporting of CPM does not consider measurement error. Hence, the magnitude of change representing a "true" CPM effect is unknown. ⋯ Determining "true" change in CPM will underpin future interrogations of intraindividual differences in CPM. PERSPECTIVE: This study used a distribution-based statistical approach to identify real change in CPM, based on the SEM for the test stimulus. Healthy volunteers demonstrate substantial within-subject variation; CPM effect was paradigm dependent at intrasession testing and unstable to the same paradigm at intersession testing.
-
Despite growing evidence of significant racial disparities in the experience and treatment of chronic pain, the mechanisms by which these disparities manifest have remained relatively understudied. The current study examined the relationship between past experiences of racial discrimination and pain-related outcomes (self-rated disability and depressive symptomatology) and tested the potential mediating roles of pain catastrophizing and perceived injustice related to pain. Analyses consisted of cross-sectional path modeling in a multiracial sample of 137 individuals with chronic low back pain (Hispanics: n = 43; blacks: n = 43; whites: n = 51). ⋯ Future research is needed to investigate temporal and causal mechanisms suggested by the model through longitudinal and clinical intervention studies. PERSPECTIVE: More frequent prior experiences of racial discrimination are associated with greater depressive symptomatology and pain-related disability in individuals with chronic low back pain. These associations are explained by the degree of injustice perception related to pain, but not pain catastrophizing, and were stronger among black and Hispanic participants.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial
Efficacy of Interpretation Bias Modification in Patients with Chronic Pain.
Patients with chronic pain demonstrate interpretational bias to pain, and models of pain suggest interpretational bias affects subsequent pain experience. This study developed an interpretation bias modification for pain (IBM-P) and examined its efficacy. A total of 48 patients with chronic pain were recruited and randomly assigned to either the training group (n = 24) or the control group (n = 24). ⋯ Future research is needed to confirm the effect of modifying interpretational bias and its clinical utility in the field of pain management. PERSPECTIVE: This article investigated the efficacy of IBM-P and suggested that modifying interpretational bias is followed by changes in negative emotions and attentional bias. These findings may help health professionals understand the role of interpretational bias in chronic pain and encourage the potential use of IBM in pain management.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial
Linking non-restorative sleep and activity interference through pain catastrophizing and pain severity: An intra-day process model among individuals with fibromyalgia.
Nonrestorative sleep is a key diagnostic feature of the musculoskeletal pain disorder fibromyalgia and is robustly associated with poor physical functioning, including activity interference. However, the mechanisms through which nonrestorative sleep elicits activity interference among individuals with fibromyalgia at the within-person level remain unclear. The present study tested the following 3-path mediation model, using data gathered from a 21-day electronic daily diary in 220 individuals with fibromyalgia: previous night nonrestorative sleep → morning pain catastrophizing → afternoon pain severity → end-of-day activity interference. ⋯ These findings point to the potential utility of targeted interventions that improve both sleep quality and pain catastrophizing to help individuals with chronic pain engage in important daily activities despite experiencing pain. PERSPECTIVE: This study provides a better understanding of how nonrestorative sleep is associated with daily activity interference among individuals with fibromyalgia. An intervention that targets attenuating nonrestorative sleep and pain catastrophizing may help improve daily physical functioning of this population.