The journal of pain : official journal of the American Pain Society
-
Review Meta Analysis
ACCEPTANCE AND COMMITMENT THERAPY FOR CHRONIC PAIN: AN OVERVIEW OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS WITH META-ANALYSIS OF RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIALS.
This overview of reviews aimed to summarize the evidence from systematic reviews and meta-analyses of randomized clinical trials of the efficacy of acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) for adults with chronic pain in relation to pain intensity, pain-related functioning, quality of life, and psychological factors. The Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Embase, PsycINFO, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library databases were searched from inception to July 2, 2023. AMSTAR 2 was used to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. ⋯ Overall, however, randomized clinical trials and systematic reviews show that ACT can improve outcomes related to chronic pain (eg, pain-related functioning). Future systematic reviews should address the methodological and clinical concerns identified here to produce higher-quality findings. PERSPECTIVE: Despite certain methodological and clinical issues, randomized clinical trials and systematic reviews of ACT appear to show that it can improve outcomes related to chronic pain (eg, psychological factors).
-
Recent reports have pointed to problems with the term "pain catastrophizing." Critiques of the term pain catastrophizing have come from several sources including individuals with chronic pain, advocates for individuals with chronic pain, and pain scholars. Reports indicate that the term has been used to dismiss the medical basis of pain complaints, to question the authenticity of pain complaints, and to blame individuals with pain for their pain condition. In this paper, we advance the position that the problems prompting calls to rename the construct of pain catastrophizing have little to do with the term, and as such, changing the term will do little to solve these problems. ⋯ Recommendations are made for remediation of the problems that have contributed to calls to rename the term pain catastrophizing. PERSPECTIVE: The issues prompting calls to rename the construct of pain catastrophizing have their roots in fundamental flaws in how individuals with pain are assessed and treated. Efforts to address these problems will require more than a simple change in terminology.
-
The posterior insular cortex (PIC) is well positioned to perform somatosensory-limbic integration; yet, the function of neuronal subsets within the PIC in processing the sensory and affective dimensions of pain remains unclear. Here, we employ bidirectional chemogenetic modulation to characterize the function of PIC CaMKIIa-expressing excitatory neurons in a comprehensive array of sensory, affective, and thermoregulatory behaviors. Excitatory pyramidal neurons in the PIC were found to be sensitized under inflammatory pain conditions. ⋯ Our findings reveal that PIC CaMKIIa-expressing neurons are a critical hub for producing both sensory and affective pain-like behaviors and important for thermoregulatory processing. PERSPECTIVE: The present study reveals that activation of the posterior insula produces hyperalgesia and negative affect, and has a role in thermal tolerance and thermoregulation. These findings highlight the insula as a key player in contributing to the multidimensionality of pain.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial
Placebo hypoalgesia and nocebo hyperalgesia induced by observational learning may be difficult to disentangle in a laboratory setting.
Observational learning (OBL) (seeing pain/pain treatment in others) can evoke placebo hypoalgesia and nocebo hyperalgesia. Data that compare these effects and illuminates the role of expectations and empathy are scarce. Healthy participants (n = 105) were randomized to: 1) placebo OBL, 2) nocebo OBL, or 3) no-observation control group. ⋯ Implications for existing theories are discussed. PERSPECTIVE: Data that systematically compare placebo hypoalgesia and nocebo hyperalgesia induced by OBL are scarce. The current work illustrates that these effects may be more difficult to disentangle than previously assumed, which could have implications for existing theories on OBL and placebo effects and their translation to clinical practice.