The journal of pain : official journal of the American Pain Society
-
Multicenter Study
Validating PRISM (Pictorial Representation of Illness and Self Measure) as a measure of suffering in chronic non-cancer pain patients.
The Pictorial Representation of Illness and Self Measure (PRISM) is a recently developed tool designed to measure the burden of suffering due to illness in a variety of patient populations. The purpose of the current study was to validate PRISM as a measure of suffering in patients with chronic non-cancer pain. Patients (n = 138) were recruited from 2 hospital pain clinics, where they were participating in a 10-week, mindfulness-based chronic pain management course and during which they completed validated questionnaires to assess their outcomes. Convergent validity was assessed by correlating their PRISM scores with scores on the Short-Form 36v2 quality of life instrument, the Pain Catastrophizing Scale, and the 0 to 10 Numeric Pain Scale. Content validity and test-retest reliability were assessed, and a factor analysis performed to identify relationships among the PRISM domains. PRISM was found to have good reliability and was significantly correlated with many of the subdomains of the other questionnaires. Qualitative data (n = 26) revealed that PRISM was well understood and that there was consistency in interpreting the task. Our data suggest that the PRISM task measures constructs relating to quality of life, pain catastrophizing, and pain intensity and probably measures suffering in patients with chronic non-cancer pain, providing a novel and quick tool for clinicians. ⋯ This study demonstrates the reliability and validity of the PRISM task for measuring the burden of pain in a population of chronic pain sufferers. Clinicians in the field of chronic pain management may find PRISM useful for monitoring the impact of pain management strategies on pain perception and the psychosocial variables that influence suffering.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial
Analgesic efficacy and safety of oxycodone in combination with naloxone as prolonged release tablets in patients with moderate to severe chronic pain.
This randomized, double-blind, placebo- and active-controlled, parallel-group study was designed to demonstrate the superiority of oxycodone in combination with naloxone in a prolonged release (PR) formulation over placebo with respect to analgesic efficacy. The active control group was included for sensitivity and safety analyses, and furthermore to compare the analgesic efficacy and bowel function of oxycodone PR/naloxone PR with oxycodone PR alone. The analgesic efficacy was measured as the time from the initial dose of study medication to multiple pain events (ie, inadequate analgesia) in patients with moderate to severe chronic low back pain. The full analysis population consisted of 463 patients. The times to recurrent pain events were significantly longer in the oxycodone PR/naloxone PR group compared with placebo (P < .0001-.0003); oxycodone PR/naloxone PR reduced the risk of pain events by 42% (P < .0001; full analysis population). The appearance of pain events was comparable for oxycodone PR/naloxone PR versus oxycodone PR, confirming that the addition of naloxone PR to oxycodone PR in a combination tablet did not negatively affect analgesic efficacy of the opioid. Furthermore, oxycodone PR/naloxone PR offers benefits in terms of an improvement in bowel function. In a therapeutic area of great unmet need, therefore, the combination tablet of oxycodone PR/naloxone PR offers patients effective analgesia while improving opioid-induced bowel dysfunction. Taken together with the observation that the safety profile of oxycodone PR/naloxone PR is consistent with that expected from other opioid analgesics except opioid-induced constipation, these findings indicate that the addition of naloxone to oxycodone in a PR combination tablet offers improved tolerability. Oxycodone PR/naloxone PR is therefore a promising new treatment approach for the management of chronic pain. ⋯ This study evaluated the analgesic efficacy and safety of the combination of oxycodone PR/naloxone PR in chronic nonmalignant pain. Opioids are often reduced in dosage or even discontinued as a result of impaired bowel function, leading to insufficient pain treatment. Not only does oxycodone PR/naloxone PR demonstrate analgesic efficacy comparable with oxycodone PR, but it also improves opioid-induced bowel dysfunction, and may therefore improve the acceptability of long-term opioid treatment for chronic pain.
-
An upregulation of the endogenous opioid, dynorphin A, in the spinal cord is seen in multiple experimental models of chronic pain. Recent findings implicate a direct excitatory action of dynorphin A at bradykinin receptors to promote hyperalgesia in nerve injured rats, and its upregulation may promote, rather than counteract, enhanced nociceptive input due to injury. Here we examined a model of inflammatory pain by unilateral injection of complete Freund's adjuvant (CFA) into the rat hind paw. Rats exhibited tactile hypersensitivity and thermal hyperalgesia in the inflamed paw by 6 hours after CFA injection, whereas a significant elevation of prodynorphin transcripts in the lumbar spinal cord was seen at day 3 but not at 6 hours. Thermal hyperalgesia at day 3, but not at 6 hours, after CFA injection was blocked by intrathecal administration of anti-dynorphin antiserum or by bradykinin receptor antagonists. The antihyperalgesic effect of the latter was not due to de novo production of bradykinin or upregulation of spinal bradykinin receptors. These data suggest that elevated spinal dynorphin on peripheral inflammation mediates chronic inflammatory hyperalgesia. The antihyperalgesic effect of bradykinin receptor antagonists requires the presence of upregulated spinal dynorphin but not of de novo production of bradykinin, supporting our hypothesis that pathological levels of dynorphin may activate spinal bradykinin receptors to mediate inflammatory hyperalgesia. ⋯ This study shows that chronic peripheral inflammation induces a significant upregulation of the endogenous opioid peptide dynorphin. Elevated levels of spinal dynorphin and activation of spinal bradykinin receptors are essential to maintain inflammatory hyperalgesia. The results suggest that blockade of spinal bradykinin receptors may have therapeutic potential in chronic inflammatory pain.
-
Central nervous system lesions cause peripheral dysfunctions currently attributed to central cell death that compromises function of intact peripheral nerves. Injecting quisqualate (QUIS) into the rat spinal cord models spinal cord injury (SCI) and causes at-level scratching and self-injury. Such overgrooming was interpreted to model pain until patients with self-injurious scratching after SCI reported itch motivated scratching that was painless because of sensory loss. Because self-injurious scratching is difficult to explain by central mechanisms alone, we hypothesized that QUIS injections damage peripheral axons of at-level afferents. QUIS was injected into thoracic spinal cords of 18 Long-Evans rats. Animals were killed 3 days after overgrooming began or 14 days after injection. Spinal cord lesions were localized and DRG-immunolabeled for ATF-3. At-level and control skin samples were PGP9.5-immunabeled to quantify axons. Eighty-four percent of QUIS rats overgroomed. Skin in these regions had lost two-thirds of epidermal innervation as compared with controls (P < .001). Rats that overgroomed had 47% less axon-length than nongrooming rats (P = .006). The presence of ATF-3 immunolabeled neurons within diagnosis-related groups of QUIS rats indicated death of afferent cell bodies. Overgrooming after QUIS injections may not be due entirely to central changes. As in humans, self-injurious neuropathic scratching appeared to require loss of protective pain sensations in addition to peripheral denervation. ⋯ This study suggests that intramedullary injection of quisqualic acid in rats causes death of at-level peripheral as well as central neurons. Self-injurious dermatomal scratching that develops in spinal-injured rats may reflect neuropathic itch and loss of protective pain sensations.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial
Neurophysiology of the cortical pain network: revisiting the role of S1 in subjective pain perception via standardized low-resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (sLORETA).
Multiple studies have supported the usefulness of standardized low-resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (sLORETA) in localizing generators of scalp-recorded potentials. The current study implemented sLORETA on pain event-related potentials, primarily aiming at validating this technique for pain research by identifying well-known pain-related regions. Subsequently, we pointed at investigating the still-debated and ambiguous topic of pain intensity coding at these regions, focusing on their relative impact on subjective pain perception. sLORETA revealed significant activations of the bilateral primary somatosensory (SI) and anterior cingulate cortices and of the contralateral operculoinsular and dorsolateral prefrontal (DLPFC) cortices (P < .05 for each). Activity of these regions, excluding DLPFC, correlated with subjective numerical pain scores (P < .05 for each). However, a multivariate regression analysis (R = .80; P = .024) distinguished the contralateral SI as the only region whose activation magnitude significantly predicted the subjective perception of noxious stimuli (P = .020), further substantiated by a reduced regression model (R = .75, P = .008). Based on (1) correspondence of the pain-activated regions identified by sLORETA with the acknowledged imaging-based pain-network and (2) the contralateral SI proving to be the most contributing region in pain intensity coding, we found sLORETA to be an appropriate tool for relevant pain research and further substantiated the role of SI in pain perception. ⋯ Because the literature of pain intensity coding offers inconsistent findings, the current article used a novel tool for revisiting this controversial issue. Results suggest that it is the activation magnitude of SI, which solely establishes the significant correlation with subjective pain ratings, in accordance with the classical clinical thinking, relating SI lesions to diminished perception of pain. Although this study cannot support a causal relation between SI activation magnitude and pain perception, such relation might be insinuated.