The journal of pain : official journal of the American Pain Society
-
This cross-sectional study describes chronic pain in 94 persons with multiple sclerosis residing in the community. The characteristics of chronic pain, pain-related disability, pain treatments, barriers to health care, and impact on quality of life were examined. Sixty-four percent of participants reported chronic pain; of these, 60% had dysesthetic pain and 70% had episodic increases in pain. The mean numerical pain intensity rating score was moderate (5). Chronic Pain Grade was used to classify severity of pain, using scores for items for pain intensity and pain-related disability. Those in the higher pain grades had more disability and recorded more health care visits (P = .06) (not significant because of small sample size). Effective pain management techniques included analgesic medication and physical measures as reported by 54% and 44% participants, respectively. Participants' perceived barriers to health care included environmental and personal factors. Those with multiple sclerosis and pain, compared with those with no pain, showed a significant difference in the domain of psychological well-being scores (P = .01) on the Assessment of Quality of Life scale. Additionally, the domains of independent living (P = .009) and total scores (P = .04) showed better quality of life in participants with lower pain grades. Improved understanding of chronic pain in this population may facilitate early identification for timely intervention and minimize pain-related disability. ⋯ This article describes chronic pain in persons with multiple sclerosis living in the community. The information regarding pain prevalence, pain-related disability, and impact on quality of life provides insight into the complex multidimensional pain experience. Improved understanding of pain and early intervention may contribute to the overall well-being and decrease pain-related disability in this population.
-
The goal of this study was to determine the intra- and interday reliability of pressure pain thresholds (PPT) in the upper extremity and torso of asymptomatic women. Nineteen healthy women (20-39 years) with no underlying musculoskeletal problems had 3 PPT trials performed on 8 different locations in the upper extremity and torso over 4 consecutive days. The test-retest reliability of PPT values was robust and highly consistent over the 4 days. The PPT intraclass correlations (ICC) were highly consistent and repeatable over the 4 days of testing (day 1: ICC = 0.94; day 2: ICC = 0.96; day 3: ICC = 0.97 and day 4: ICC = 0.96). When compared with baseline measurements obtained on day 1, the PPT values were significantly lower (P < .05) on days 2, 3, and 4 at all 8 locations. Although the PPT test-retest reliability is robust and consistent throughout the 4 days, there appears to be a similar overall decline in the magnitude of the absolute PPT response at each of the 8 locations. A specific explanation for this greater overall sensitivity in PPTs at all 8 locations is lacking; however, a centrally mediated alteration in pressure/pain sensation could contribute to the overall trend observed in this study. ⋯ PPT measurements of the upper limb and torso will be significantly lower with repeated measures over a short period time. A standardized evaluation grid should be included in baseline so as to accurately evaluate the progression in shoulder rehabilitation in women with shoulder dysfunction.
-
The development of more effective methods of relieving pain associated with burn injury is a major unmet medical need. Not only is acute burn injury pain a source of immense suffering, but it has been linked to debilitating chronic pain and stress-related disorders. Although pain management guidelines and protocols have been developed and implemented, unrelieved moderate-to-severe pain continues to be reported after burn injury. One reason for this is that the intensity of pain associated with wound care and rehabilitation therapy, the major source of severe pain in this patient population, varies widely over the 3 phases of burn recovery, making it difficult to estimate analgesic requirements. The effects of opioids, the most commonly administered analgesics for burn injury procedural pain, are difficult to gauge over the course of burn recovery because the need for an opioid may change rapidly, resulting in the overmedication or undermedication of burn-injured patients. Understanding the mechanisms that contribute to the intensity and variability of burn injury pain over time is crucial to its proper management. We provide an overview of the types of pain associated with a burn injury, describe how these different types of pain interfere with the phases of burn recovery, and summarize pharmacologic pain management strategies across the continuum of burn care. We conclude with a discussion and suggestions for improvement. Rational management, based on the underlying mechanisms that contribute to the intensity and variability of burn injury pain, is in its infancy. The paucity of information highlights the need for research that explores and advances the identification of mechanisms of acute and chronic burn injury pain. ⋯ Researchers continue to report that burn pain is undertreated. This review examines burn injury pain management across the phases of burn recovery, emphasizing 3 types of pain that require separate assessment and management. It provides insights and suggestions for future research directions to address this significant clinical problem.
-
In the present study, the adrenergic receptor (AR) subtype mediating adrenergic augmentation of P2X(3) receptor-mediated nociceptive responses on sensory nerve endings was examined by using selective AR receptor agonists and antagonists in Sprague Dawley rats in the uninjured state. Local administration of alphabeta-methyleneATP (ligand for P2X3/P2X2/3 receptors) into the plantar hind paw produced few pain behaviors when given alone in this strain of rats; combination with adrenaline (alpha1- and alpha2-AR agonist) and phenylephrine (alpha1-AR agonist) but not clonidine or UK 14,304 (alpha2-AR agonists) increased flinching behaviors. Flinching produced by noradrenaline (NA)/alphabeta-methyleneATP was suppressed by low doses of prazosin (alpha1-AR antagonist), and this reduction was selective compared with yohimbine (alpha2-AR antagonist). Prazosin also reduced flinching produced by phenylephrine/alphabeta-methyleneATP. Using thermal threshold determinations, adrenaline and phenylephrine but not clonidine or UK 14,304, mimicked the action of NA in augmenting reductions in thermal thresholds produced by alphabeta-methyleneATP. Terazosin (another alpha1-AR antagonist) inhibited hyperalgesia produced by NA/alphabeta-methyleneATP. These results provide evidence for alpha1-AR involvement in adrenergic augmentation of P2X3/P2X2/3 receptor-mediated responses on sensory nerve endings in the uninjured state in Sprague Dawley rats. ⋯ This study indicates the alpha1-adrenergic receptor subtype mediates adrenergic augmentation of the activation of sensory nerves by purinergic P2X3 receptors (respond to ATP) in the periphery. Observations are potentially relevant to chronic pain conditions in which sympathetic nerves influence sensory nerves.
-
Emotionally charged facial expressions (happy, fear) served as conditioned stimuli in a differential fear conditioning procedure. Expressions were presented in pseudo-random order on a computer monitor. For half of the participants, the fear expression was paired with an aversive electric stimulation (UCS), whereas the happy expression was unpaired. The other participants had the opposite pairing. To assess the influence of conditioned fear on pain, expressions were shown again in the absence of the UCS and pain threshold was assessed during each expression. The latency of finger withdrawal from a radiant heat device was used to index pain threshold. Skin conductance response (SCR) and self-reported emotion were measured to assess fear conditioning. Consistent with preparedness theory, differential fear conditioning was only present when the fear expression was paired with the UCS. Moreover, pain threshold was only influenced by fear conditioning in persons for whom the fear expression was paired with the UCS. Specifically, finger withdrawal latencies were lower (suggesting hyperalgesia) during the fear expression than during the happy expression; an effect that was not present before CS-UCS pairing. This work suggests that some stimuli are more readily associated with an aversive event and can lead to pain enhancement. ⋯ Although preliminary, these results suggest that fear-relevant environmental stimuli (including facial expressions) may provide important environmental cues during aversive events that influence the level of pain experienced.