Liver transplantation : official publication of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the International Liver Transplantation Society
-
The intent of regional sharing for status 1 candidates is to promote timely access to donor livers. Presumably this decreases waitlist mortality. Little published data exists that supports this policy. ⋯ Adult patient survival was not significantly different between the periods. In conclusion, regional sharing for status 1 candidates results in an increased transplant rate and a reduction in waitlist mortality. Sharing did not impact waitlist mortality for non-status 1 candidates.
-
The pediatric end-stage liver disease (PELD) model accurately estimates 90-day waitlist mortality for pediatric liver transplant candidates, but it has been unclear if PELD can identify patients who will derive survival benefit from undergoing liver transplantation (LT), if it correlates with posttransplant survival, or if it can identify patients for whom LT would be futile. Pediatric patients who underwent LT between 2001 and 2004 were enrolled through the United Network for Organ Sharing Organ Procurement and Transplant Network database. Survival benefit was measured in terms of life-years gained during the first year after LT. ⋯ No "threshold" PELD score, beyond which risk of post-LT mortality increased dramatically, was apparent. In conclusion, pediatric patients with a PELD score of 17+ derive survival benefit early after LT, and increasing PELD scores are associated with increasing transplant benefit after liver transplantation. PELD does correlate with posttransplant survival but should not be used as a marker for futility.
-
Comparative Study
Increasing the liver donor pool through donation after cardiac death.
-
To overcome the barrier of size match, right lobe graft has been widely used in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). We assessed donor outcome, with a focus on remnant liver volume (RLV) after right hepatectomy based on the experiences of 2 LDLT centers, as a means of guiding the establishment of safe RLV limits for donor right hepatectomy. Between January 2002 and December 2003, a consecutive 146 liver donors who underwent right hepatectomy with at least 12 months of follow-up were enrolled in this study. ⋯ Minor morbidities were also comparable in the 2 groups. In conclusion, the outcome of donors with an RLV of <35% was not different from that of donors with an RLV of > or = 35%, with the exception of transient cholestasis. Therefore, a remnant RLV of <35% does not appear to be a contraindication for right liver procurement in living donors.
-
Comparative Study
Effect of low central venous pressure and phlebotomy on blood product transfusion requirements during liver transplantations.
Correction of coagulation defects with plasma transfusion did not decrease the need for intraoperative red blood cells (RBC) transfusions during liver transplantations. On the contrary, it led to a hypervolemic state that resulted in an increase of shed blood. As well, plasma transfusion has been associated with a decreased one-year survival rate. ⋯ In conclusion, the avoidance of plasma transfusion and maintenance of a low CVP prior to the anhepatic phase were associated with a decrease in RBC transfusions during liver transplantations. Previous reports indicating that it is neither useful nor necessary to correct coagulation defects with plasma transfusion prior to liver transplantation are further corroborated by this prospective survey. We believe that this work also supports the practice of lowering CVP with phlebotomy in order to reduce blood loss, during liver dissection, without any deleterious effect.