Pain physician
-
Randomized Controlled Trial
Stimulation of the greater occipital nerve: anatomical considerations and clinical implications.
Stimulation of the greater occipital nerve has been employed for various intractable headache conditions for more than a decade. Still, prospective studies that correlate stimulation of the greater occipital nerve with outcome of patients with respect to alleviation of headache are sparsely found in literature. ⋯ From our study we conclude that a reproducible stimulation of the greater occipital nerve can be achieved by placing the electrodes parallel to the atlas, at about 30 mm distance to the external occipital protuberance. The response to the stimulation is not correlated to the field width of the paraesthesia. We, therefore, consider stimulation of the main trunk of the greater occipital nerve to be more important than a large field of stimulation on the occiput. Still, an individual response to the occipital nerve stimulation cannot be predicted even by optimal electrode placement.
-
Case Reports Historical Article
Magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar spine in a patient with a spinal cord stimulator.
The use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is continuously escalating for the evaluation of patients with persistent pain following lumbar spine surgery (LSS). Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) therapy is being clinically applied much more commonly for the management of chronic pain following LSS. There is an increased probability that these 2 incompatible modalities may be accidentally used in the same patient. ⋯ This case demonstrates the lack of compatibility of lumbar MRI and the Precision SCS system as well as one of the possible patient adverse events that can occur when patients are exposed to MRI outside of the approved device labeling.
-
Case Reports
Transversus abdominis plane neurolysis with phenol in abdominal wall cancer pain palliation.
Pain is commonly perceived by patients during cancer and its treatment. Although most patients respond to conservative management implemented according to the World Health Organization guidelines, a subset of patients with advanced disease develop intractable pain that may require additional interventions such as regional blocks and intrathecal therapy. Patients with terminal abdominal or pelvic cancer who have high tumor burdens are often offered a diagnostic visceral nerve block followed by neurolysis for pain palliation. ⋯ The patient tolerated the procedure well and demonstrated sustained analgesia for 45 days before dying of the disease. We also demonstrated that TAP block significantly reduces the total opioid requirement as demonstrated by the morphine equivalent daily dose score after the neurolytic procedure. This result supports our belief that TAP block with TAP neurolysis is an effective and inexpensive modality that can be used to palliate intractable abdominal wall pain in patients with terminal abdominal cancer.