The lancet oncology
-
The lancet oncology · Feb 2019
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative StudyPerformance of human papillomavirus testing on self-collected versus clinician-collected samples for the detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia of grade 2 or worse: a randomised, paired screen-positive, non-inferiority trial.
Human papillomavirus (HPV) testing on self-collected samples is a potential alternative to HPV testing on clinician-collected samples, but non-inferiority of its clinical accuracy remains to be assessed in the regular screening population. The IMPROVE study was done to evaluate the clinical accuracy of primary HPV testing on self-collected samples within an organised screening setting. ⋯ Ministry of Health, Welfare, and Sport (Netherlands), and the European Commission.
-
The lancet oncology · Feb 2019
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative StudyShort-term androgen suppression and radiotherapy versus intermediate-term androgen suppression and radiotherapy, with or without zoledronic acid, in men with locally advanced prostate cancer (TROG 03.04 RADAR): 10-year results from a randomised, phase 3, factorial trial.
The optimal duration of androgen suppression for men with locally advanced prostate cancer receiving radiotherapy with curative intent is yet to be defined. Zoledronic acid is effective in preventing androgen suppression-induced bone loss, but its role in preventing castration-sensitive bone metastases in locally advanced prostate cancer is unclear. The RADAR trial assessed whether the addition of 12 months of adjuvant androgen suppression, 18 months of zoledronic acid, or both, can improve outcomes in men with locally advanced prostate cancer who receive 6 months of androgen suppression and prostatic radiotherapy. This report presents 10-year outcomes from this trial. ⋯ National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Australia, AbbVie Pharmaceuticals Australia, New Zealand Health Research Council, New Zealand Cancer Society, Cancer Standards Institute New Zealand, University of Newcastle (Australia), Hunter Medical Research Institute, Calvary Mater Newcastle Radiation Oncology Fund, and Maitland Cancer Appeal.
-
The lancet oncology · Feb 2019
ReviewPharmacologic management of cognitive impairment induced by cancer therapy.
Cognitive dysfunction is a challenging adverse effect of chemotherapy and radiotherapy that has limited treatment options. Clinical trials for proposed pharmacotherapeutic interventions to help manage these cognitive symptoms have had conflicting results and no standard of care has yet been established. Pharmacotherapeutic approaches for cancer therapy-induced cognitive symptoms include CNS stimulants (eg, methylphenidate and modafinil), medications used in patients with memory impairment (eg, donepezil, memantine, and ginkgo biloba), and bone marrow supporting agents (eg, erythropoietin). ⋯ Therefore, large clinical trials for these putative memory-enhancing drugs are needed to establish their clinical value in an oncology setting. Several clinical trials testing novel pharmacotherapeutic interventions for the management of cognitive dysfunction are ongoing, as well as numerous preclinical studies. With an increasing understanding of the molecular and cellular mechanisms underlying cognitive deficits in patients with cancer, novel treatment strategies are emerging.
-
The lancet oncology · Feb 2019
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative StudyPatient-reported outcomes of patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma treated with nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus sunitinib (CheckMate 214): a randomised, phase 3 trial.
In the ongoing phase 3, CheckMate 214 trial, nivolumab plus ipilimumab improved overall survival compared with sunitinib in patients with intermediate or poor risk, previously untreated, advanced renal cell carcinoma. We aimed to assess whether health-related quality of life (HRQoL) could be used to further describe the benefit-risk profile of nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus sunitinib. ⋯ Bristol-Myers Squibb and ONO Pharmaceutical.
-
The lancet oncology · Feb 2019
ReviewTowards an evidence-informed value scale for surgical and radiation oncology: a multi-stakeholder perspective.
Surgery and radiotherapy, two locoregional cancer treatments, are essential to help improve cancer outcomes, control, and palliation. The continued evolution in treatment processes, techniques, and technologies-often at substantially increased costs-demands for direction on outcomes that are most valued by patients, and the evidence that is required before clinical adoption of these practices. Three recently introduced frameworks-the European Society for Medical Oncology Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale, the American Society of Clinical Oncology Value Framework, and the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Blocks-which all help define the value of oncology treatments, were appraised with a focus on their methods and definition of patient benefit. ⋯ Findings show that these frameworks are not immediately transferable to locoregional cancer treatments. Moreover, the lack of emphasis on patient perspective and the reliance on traditional, trial-based endpoints such as survival, disease-free survival, and safety, calls for a new framework that includes real-world evidence with focus on the whole spectrum of patient-centred endpoints. Such an evidence-informed value scale would safeguard against the proliferation of low-value innovation while simultaneously increasing access to treatments that show significant improvements in the outcomes of cancer care.