Emergency medicine journal : EMJ
-
Patient surveys and research have shown that Emergency Department attendees do not receive adequate analgesia. Pain monitoring has not been automated and usually involves a member of staff asking the patient to rate their score with no continuous record, often no specific place to record it and no automated alarm system for scores outside accepted parameters. Few patients have regular monitoring of their pain and our own preliminary research showed that over one week only 58% of patients with moderate to severe pain had a second or subsequent score recorded. ⋯ We aim to recruit 200 patients (100 per arm) from the emergency department at Leicester Royal Infirmary. All patients will use the display. This is a parallel group, two arm superiority trial with a 1:1 allocation ratio. Patients will be randomised to have their pain score on display (intervention) or hidden (control). Blinding is not possible. The display beeps every 15 min to remind patients to enter their pain score. Treatment will not be constrained by study protocol and will depend on the judgment of the treating clinician. The study will continue for up to 6 hours to allow time for the first dose of analgesia to wear off. Data collection will cease when the patient leaves the department. Questionnaires will be given to participants and the staff nursing them.
-
An NHS England review recognised that demand for Urgent and Emergency Care is unsustainable. Health practitioners and policy makers are interested in understanding the reasons why patients with low acuity problems attend the Emergency Department (ED). This should, in turn, assist the development of interventions to reduce demand.We aimed to gain an understanding about the reasons for rising ED demand and to identify possible solutions. ⋯ We found evidence of a rise in patients being referred to the ED by other healthcare services. This may be a reflection of the wider healthcare system under strain, thereby causing overspill into EDs. Future research is needed to design and test interventions that can lead to improvements in the system that are acceptable to patients, do not lead to increased demand, are cost-effective and lead to more sustainable working environments.
-
Despite successful vaccination programmes meningococcal disease (MD) remains the leading infectious cause of septicaemia and death in children in the UK and Ireland.1,2 The early diagnosis of MD significantly improves outcomes with reduced morbidity and mortality.1,2 The early stages of MD are often indistinguishable from a simple viral illness making an early positive diagnosis of MD difficult.1 Hibergene have developed a commercially available bedside Loop-mediated isothermal AMPlification PCR (LAMP-MD) test that is a highly sensitive 0.89 (95%CI 0.72-0.96) and specific 1.0 (95%CI 0.97-1.0) for identifying children with invasive MD (4) (figure 1).emermed;34/12/A895-a/F1F1F1Figure 1 AIMS: The aims of this RCEM funded study were:Assess the ease of use and suitability for the EDDetermine the time taken to perform the testIndependently verify LAMP-MD performance against TaqMan quantitative PCR. ⋯ Meningitis Research Foundation. Meningococcal Meningitis and Septicaemia Guidance Notes2014.Ó Maoldomhnaigh, et al. Invasive meningococcal diseasein children in Ireland. PMID: 27566800.NICE. Management of petechial rash.Bourke TW, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of loop-mediated isothermal amplification as a near-patient test for meningococcal diseasein children. PMID: 25728843.
-
ED crowding is associated with increased mortality, poor staff and patient experience, an increased inpatient length of stay and poor compliance with the four-hour emergency access standard.1 Where crowding is caused by exit block, the focus needs to be on whole system patient management, reducing the temporal mismatch between admissions and discharges since at times of peak demand hospitals may become gridlocked until patients are discharged.In an attempt to tackle exit block, the Scottish Government Unscheduled Care Team have implemented the Daily Dynamic Discharge (DDD) approach, which aims to increase the number of inpatient discharges by 12 pm, thus enabling more timeous flow through the ED. ⋯ Richardson DB. Increase in patient mortality at 10 days associated with emergency department overcrowding. Med J Aust2006;184(5):213-216.
-
Over the last decade, a number of European cities including London, have witnessed high profile terrorist attacks resulting in major incidents with large numbers of casualties. Triage, the process of categorising casualties on the basis of their clinical acuity, is a key principle in the effective management of major incidents.The Modified Physiological Triage Tool (MPTT) is a recently developed primary triage tool which in comparison to existing triage tools, including the 2013 UK NARU Sieve, demonstrates the greatest sensitivity at predicting need for life-saving intervention (LSI) within both military and civilian populations.To improve the applicability and usability of the MPTT we increased the upper respiratory rate threshold to 24 breaths per minute (MPTT-24), to make it divisible by four, and included an assessment of external catastrophic haemorrhage. The aim of this study was to conduct a feasibility analysis of the proposed MPTT-24 (figure 1).emermed;34/12/A860-b/F1F1F1Figure 1MPTT-24 METHODS: A retrospective review of the Joint Theatre Trauma Registry (JTTR) and Trauma Audit Research Network (TARN) databases was performed for all adult (>18 years) patients presenting between 2006-2013 (JTTR) and 2014 (TARN). Patients were defined as priority one (P1) if they had received one or more life-saving interventions.Using first recorded hospital physiology, patients were categorised as P1 or not-P1 by existing triage tools and both MPTT and MPTT-24. Performance characteristics were evaluated using sensitivity, specificity, under and over-triage with a McNemar test to determine statistical significance. ⋯ Basic study characteristics are shown in Table 1. Both the MPTT and MPTT-24 outperformed all existing triage methods with a statistically significant (p<0.001) absolute reduction of between 25.5%-29.5% in under-triage when compared to existing UK civilian methods (NARU Sieve). In both populations the MPTT-24 demonstrated an absolute reduction in sensitivity with an increase in specificity when compared to the MPTT. A statistically significant difference was observed between the MPTT and MPTT-24 in the way they categorised TARN and JTTR cases as P1 (p<0.001).emermed;34/12/A860-b/T1F2T1Table 1Study characteristicsemermed;34/12/A860-b/T2F3T2Table 2Performance analysis CONCLUSION: Existing UK methods of primary major incident triage, including the NARU Sieve, are not fit for purpose, with unacceptably high rates of under-triage. When compared to the MPTT, the MPTT-24 allows for a more rapid triage assessment and continues to outperform existing triage tools at predicting need for life-saving intervention. Its use should be considered in civilian and military major incidents.