Emergency medicine journal : EMJ
-
The optimal management of minor head injured patients with brain injury identified by CT imaging is unclear. Some guidelines recommend routine hospital admission of GCS13-15 patients with traumatic brain (TBI) injury identified by CT imaging. Others argue that selected lower-risk patients can be discharged from the Emergency Department (ED). ⋯ 4431 studies were identified by the search strategy, of which 123 studies were fully retrieved and 49 primary studies and 5 reviews met the inclusion criteria. The estimated pooled risk of the outcomes of interest were: clinical deterioration 11.7% (95% CI:11.7 to 15.8; neurosurgery 3.5% (95% CI:2.2% to 4.9%); death 1.4% (95% CI:0.8% to 2.2%). A large degree of between study variation in the estimates of the outcomes was identified. Multivariable meta-regression of study characteristics identified that mean age of the study population and mean initial GCS accounted for up to half of the variation in reported study outcomes. Within studies the following factors were found to affect the risk for these adverse outcomes: age; severity of injury; type of injury; initial GCS; anti-coagulation; anti-platelet medication; and injury severity scoring. When univariable within study risk factor effect estimates were pooled patients with isolated subarachnoid haemorrhage had an odds ratio of 0.19 for deterioration compared to other injury types.emermed;34/12/A862-a/F2F2F2Figure 2Meta-regression of study factors predictive of neurosurgery CONCLUSION: Minor head injured patients with brain injury identified by CT imaging have a clinically important risk of serious adverse outcomes. Research has identified the possible factors that affect this risk. However, these factors need to be incorporated into a validated multivariable prognostic model before low-risk patients can be reliably identified clinically and triaged to lower levels of care.emermed;34/12/A862-a/F3F3F3Figure 3PRISMA flow-diagram showing selection of studies for inclusion in the systematic review.
-
Comparative Study Observational Study
Emergency versus standard response: time efficacy of London's Air Ambulance rapid response vehicle.
The potential increased risk of an emergency response using a rapid response vehicle (RRV) should only be accepted when it allows a clinically significant time saving for management of patients who are critically injured or sick. Air ambulance services often use an RRV to maintain operational resilience. We compared the RRV response time on emergency versus standard driving to inform emergency services of time efficacy of emergency response in an urban environment. ⋯ The current study found RRVs to be significantly quicker when responding with lights, sirens and traffic rule exemptions compared with a response being compliant with all traffic signals, road signs and speed limits.
-
The over 75 s make up 20% of our ED attendances. The greatest increase has been in the over 85 s. This very elderly cohort are more likely to be frail and are 10X more likely to require admission than 20-40 year olds and once in hospital have longer stays. There is evidence that multidisciplinary care and early Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) improves outcomes for older patients, reducing readmissions, long term care, greater satisfaction and lower costs. The aim of this project was to improve the acute care provided to our older patients at the Front Door of the hospital. ⋯ 3 month pilot project underpinned by Big Room Quality Improvement methodology. The Frailty Big Room meets weekly and includes input from clinicians, QI experts and a data analyst. This project was driven by the following aims:Frailty Flying Squad to see as many older±frail patients referred for admission as close to the front door as possible.CGA at the front door with discharge planning from first reviewMDT approachExpedited discharge or transfer to other services from ED.Review following day to make sure management plans being followed through or discharge without ward teams having to become involved.Frailty Flying Squad Team:2 Medical Nurse PractitionersPhysiotherapistConsultant geriatricianKey Performance Indicators: Length of StayReadmission within 30 days of initial review RESULTS: 355 patients were seen. 168 (47%) of patients were over 85 and the median Rockwood frailty score for the whole cohort was 6. 209 patients were ED referrals and 85 were GP referrals for admission. 237 (67%) patients were seen in ED, 49 in MAU and 7 in ED obs. During the pilot period, 97 patients who had been referred for admission were discharged direct from ED. 56 (16%) of patients had zero length of stay. A low number (9.4%) of patients were readmitted within 30 days.emermed;34/12/A885-a/F1F1F1Figure 1LOSemermed;34/12/A885-a/F2F2F2Figure 2Length of stay for the > 85s 2016 and 2017 compared CONCLUSION: A multidisciplinary Acute Care of the Elderly Team predominantly based in the Emergency department can provide effective early Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment; facilitating discharge home from the Emergency Department, reducing length of stay for those admitted and reducing readmission rates within 30 days.
-
The 2015 RCEM End of Life Care best practice guideline highlighted the need for organ and tissue donation to be a usual part of end of life care in the Emergency Department (ED). NICE guideline states that all deaths meeting defined clinical triggers in the ED (in practice - mechanical ventilation, plan to withdraw life sustaining treatment, death expected) should prompt timely referral to organ donation services. Any family discussion in the ED regarding organ donation should be held collaboratively with a specialist nurse for organ donation (SNOD). What is the evidence in UK EDs that this is always the case? ⋯ In 2017, with the endorsement of RCEM, NHS Blood and Transplant published Organ Donation and the Emergency Department: A Strategy for Implementation of Best Practice. The strategy promotes identification and referral of potential organ donors in the emergency department and collaborative approach of their families when withdrawal of treatment is planned in the Emergency Department. Most importantly it is emphasised that organ donation should be firmly established as a usual part of end of life care irrespective of the location of the patient.emermed;34/12/A877-b/F1F1F1Figure 1Audited deaths in ED by organ donation region 1st april 2015 to 31st march 2016emermed;34/12/A877-b/F2F2F2Figure 2Died in emergency department meeting PDA referral criteria 1st April 2016 to 31st March 2017emermed;34/12/A877-b/F3F3F3Figure 3Families approaches regarding organ donation in the ED 1st April 2016 to 31st March 2017.
-
The presentation of multiple simultaneous trauma patients in an Emergency Department, is likely to place significant stress and strain on trauma care resources. Currently there is limited data available to understand the impact simultaneous trauma demands on patient outcomes. For the purposes of this project we define simultaneous trauma as occurring when there is more than one TARN qualifying major trauma patient within an Emergency Department at any one time. We hypothesise that with increasing numbers of simultaneous trauma patients a relative increase in mortality will be seen. ⋯ The impact of simultaneous trauma patients on patient outcomes within the UK has not been previously defined. Simultaneous trauma patients do not appear to have an impact on overall mortality rate.emermed;34/12/A888-a/T1F1T1Table 1Further work planned will understand the impact of multiple trauma patients on length of stay and time to CT/operating theatre.