American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons
-
Implementing uncontrolled donation after circulatory determination of death (uDCDD) in the United States could markedly improve supply of donor lungs for patients in need of transplants. Evidence from US pilot programs suggests families support uDCDD, but only if they are asked permission for using invasive organ preservation procedures prior to initiation. ⋯ Attempting uDCDD in this way has great potential to obtain more transplantable lungs while respecting donor autonomy and family wishes, securing public support, and enabling authorized persons to affirm or cease preservation decisions without requiring evidence of prior organ donation intent. It ensures prioritization of life-saving, the opportunity to allow willing donors to donate, and respect for bodily integrity while adhering to current ethical norms.
-
Acute cellular rejection (ACR) is a significant risk factor for chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD). Although clinically manifest and higher grade (≥A2) ACR is generally treated with augmented immunosuppression, management of minimal (grade A1) ACR remains controversial. In our program, patients with subclinical and spirometrically stable A1 rejection (StA1R) are routinely not treated with augmented immunosuppression. ⋯ The analyses demonstrated no significant difference in risk of CLAD or death in patients with a first StA1R compared to StNAR. This largest study to date shows that, in clinically stable patients, an untreated first A1 ACR in the first-year posttransplant is not significantly associated with an increased risk for CLAD or death. Watchful-waiting approach may be an acceptable tactic for stable A1 episodes in lung transplant recipients.
-
Normothermic regional perfusion (NRP) and normothermic machine perfusion (NMP) have both been used in the procurement and conditioning of abdominal organs from donation after circulatory death donors with reported improved outcomes for the recipients. Here, we describe an unusual case of a kidney that underwent NMP after NRP. After 2 hours of abdominal NRP, the intra-abdominal organs were cold flushed in situ. ⋯ During NMP, the kidney met previously described quality assurance criteria for transplant with good global perfusion and adequate renal blood flow and urine production. The kidney was transplanted into a suitable recipient who had slow early graft function but did not require dialysis posttransplant. The recipient was discharged 6 days posttransplant, and the serum creatinine level was 160 μmol/L (1.8 mg/dL) at 2 months posttransplant.
-
Ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) protocols generally limit metabolic supplementation to insulin and glucose. We sought to determine whether the addition of total parenteral nutrition (TPN) would improve lung function in EVLP. Ten porcine lungs were perfused using EVLP for 24 hours and supplemented with insulin and glucose. ⋯ In the TPN group, both FFA and BCAA concentrations remained stable at in vivo levels after initial stabilization. TNF-α concentrations were lower in the TPN group. The addition of TPN in EVLP allows for better electrolyte composition, decreased inflammation, and improved graft performance.
-
All patients with hepatocellular carcinoma meeting United Network for Organ Sharing T2 criteria currently receive the same listing priority for liver transplant (LT). A previous study from our center identified a subgroup with a very low risk of waitlist dropout who may not derive immediate LT benefit. To evaluate this issue at a national level, we analyzed within the United Network for Organ Sharing database 2052 patients with T2 hepatocellular carcinoma receiving priority listing from 2011 to 2014 in long wait time regions 1, 5, and 9. ⋯ The subgroup of 245 (11.9%) patients meeting these 4 criteria at LT listing had a 1-year probability of dropout of 5.5% vs 20% for all others (P < .001). On explant, the low dropout risk group was more likely to have complete tumor necrosis (35.5% vs 24.9%, P = .01) and less likely to exceed Milan criteria (9.9% vs 17.7%, P = .03). We identified a subgroup with a low risk of waitlist dropout who should not receive the same LT listing priority.