American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons
-
Case Reports
Combined heart and kidney transplantation in a patient with Fabry disease in the enzyme replacement therapy era.
Fabry disease (FD) is an X-linked genetic disease, resulting from the deficiency of alpha-galactosidase A, a lysosomal enzyme responsible for the cleavage of glycosphingolipids. In absence of enzyme replacement therapy (ERT), globotriaosylceramide (Gb3) accumulates in tissue, leading to progressive organ damage with severe renal, cardiac and central nervous system complications. We herein describe the first case of successful combined and simultaneous heart and kidney transplantation in a young male patient with FD complicated by end-stage renal disease and severe heart failure not responding to late-onset ERT. Combined heart and kidney transplantation can be recommended for Fabry patients with end-stage renal disease and overt hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, severe ischemic or valvular heart disease.
-
While the function of each organ is used by each transplant team to assess suitability for transplantation, little is known about the donor characteristics and clinical interventions that contribute toward overall organ transplantation potential. We conduct a retrospective review of United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) deceased donor registry data from January 2005 to December 2006. This registry contains all deceased donors from whom organs were recovered during this time period (n = 15,601). ⋯ In addition, the clinical interventions of steroid administration, desmopressin (DDAVP) and diuretic usage, as well as oxygenation, are associated with organ yield. Both intrinsic donor characteristics and medical management practice are observed to be highly variable across organ procurement organizations (OPOs). These findings may provide important information to explore and assess the efficacy of clinical interventions, compare OPO performance and point to best practices.
-
Deceased organ donation has increased rapidly since 2002, coinciding with implementation of the Organ Donation Breakthrough Collaborative. The increase in donors has resulted in a corresponding increase in the numbers of kidney, liver, lung and intestinal transplants. While transplants for most organs have increased, discard and nonrecovery rates have not improved or have increased, resulting in a decrease in organs recovered per donor (ORPD) and organs transplanted per donor (OTPD). ⋯ Meaningful increases in multicultural donation have been achieved, but donations continue to be lower than actual rates of transplantation and waiting list registrations for these groups. To counteract the decline in living donation, mechanisms such as paired donation and enhanced incentives to organ donation are being developed. Current efforts of the collaborative have focused on differentiating ORPD and OTPD targets by donor type (standard and expanded criteria donors and donors after cardiac death), utilization of the OPTN regional structure and enlisting centers to increase transplants to match increasing organ availability.
-
The 2007 American Society of Transplant Surgeons' (ASTS) State-of-the-Art Winter Symposium entitled, 'Solving the Organ Shortage Crisis' explored ways to increase the supply of donor organs to meet the challenge of increasing waiting lists and deaths while awaiting transplantation. While the increasing use of organs previously considered marginal, such as those from expanded criteria donors (ECD) or donors after cardiac death (DCD) has increased the number of transplants from deceased donors, these transplants are often associated with inferior outcomes and higher costs. ⋯ The extent by which donors may be offered incentives for donation, and the practical, ethical and legal implications of compensating organ donors were also debated. The expanded use of nonstandard organs raises potential ethical considerations about appropriate recipient selection, informed consent and concerns that the current regulatory environment discourages and penalizes these efforts.
-
Multicenter Study
The survival benefit of deceased donor liver transplantation as a function of candidate disease severity and donor quality.
The survival benefit of liver transplantation depends on candidate disease severity, as measured by MELD score. However, donor liver quality may also affect survival benefit. Using US data from the SRTR on 28 165 adult liver transplant candidates wait-listed between 2001 and 2005, we estimated survival benefit according to cross-classifications of candidate MELD score and deceased donor risk index (DRI) using sequential stratification. ⋯ All recipients with MELD > or =20 had a significant survival benefit from transplantation, regardless of DRI. Transplantation of high-DRI organs is effective for high but not low-MELD candidates. Pairing of high-DRI livers with lower-MELD candidates fails to maximize survival benefit and may deny lifesaving organs to high-MELD candidates who are at high risk of death without transplantation.