American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons
-
Multicenter Study
Donors after cardiac death: validation of identification criteria (DVIC) study for predictors of rapid death.
Donation after cardiac death (DCD) is uncommon in part because clinicians cannot prospectively identify patients who are likely to die within 60 min of withdrawal of life-sustaining treatments (LST). UNOS criteria exist but have not been validated. Consecutive patients electively withdrawn from LST at five university-affiliated hospitals were prospectively enrolled. ⋯ The data validate the UNOS criteria. Patients with no criteria might be excluded from consideration for DCD. Those with more than one criterion are reasonable candidates, while those with a single criterion should be considered if a 50% failure rate for DCD is acceptable.
-
Findings are reported from a US Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) funded study to identify barriers to increasing support for donations after cardiac death by health professionals. A donations after cardiac death (DCD) acceptance model is conceptualized and tested via 806 survey responses from certified requestors, all of whom had their identities protected through Institutional Review Board (IRB) protocol. The overall model was significant and explained 35% of the variation in DCD support. ⋯ The three greatest impediments to support of DCD exist when health professionals feel they are playing an active role in killing the patient, that a state of death has not yet been reached, and that DCD has more psychological barriers than does the brain death donation process. Opportunities and strategic initiatives are discussed to overcome these barriers, including the value of communication and education initiatives and the need for well-trained requestors. The implementation of these strategic guidelines helped to increase the number of DCD donors by 225%.
-
Comparative Study
Role of minor histocompatibility antigens in renal transplantation.
In hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), disparities between recipients and donors for minor histocompatibility antigens (mHags) have been shown to be related to graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) effects. We investigated the effect of mHag mismatches on kidney allograft survival. Out of 33 785 kidney transplants on which DNA and clinical data were available to the Collaborative Transplant Study (CTS), 702 recipient/donor pairs could be identified as HLA-A, -B and -DRB1 matched first transplants of Caucasian origin. ⋯ Similarly, only HLA-A*01, HLA-B*44 and HLA-A*24 positive pairs were considered for the evaluation of HA-3, HB-1 and ACC-1, respectively, whereas UGT2B17 compatible transplants were assessed in HLA-A*29 and HLA-B*44 positive pairs. None of the mHag disparities showed a statistically significant effect on death-censored 5-year graft survival. This report represents the first large-scale study on the relevance of mHags in kidney transplantation.
-
Immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS) has rarely been described in the course of disseminated cryptococcosis in solid organ transplant recipients. We report here the case of a renal transplant recipient who developed severe cellulitis in the context of Cryptococcus neoformans-associated IRIS while undergoing reduction of his immunosuppressive therapy. IRIS appeared concomitantly with a dramatic increase of blood CD4+ T cells (94-460/mm(3)) and required the administration of a short-term steroid therapy to resolve.