Best practice & research. Clinical anaesthesiology
-
Society and the culture of health care delivery have radically changed over the last thirty years, the rate of change increasing exponentially towards the present time. Maternity care has been part of that change. Previously paternalistic obstetricians told women whether they should or should not become pregnant, advised hospital confinements, kept women in hospital for days after their confinements, and discussed little of their management with the women themselves. ⋯ This was, and to a certain extent still is, threatening to obstetricians. But there are also genuine concerns as to whether these changes will adversely influence the morbidity and mortality of mother and child. This chapter deals with issues of maternal choice from pre conception through to the post natal period, looking at how the exercise of maternal choice may conflict with the advice of the medical profession, potentially leaving accountability and responsibility a very grey area and how all this impinges on the anaesthetist.
-
Individuals have different values. They seek to express their individuality even when receiving medical care. It is a part of modern medical practice and respect for patient autonomy to show respect for different values. ⋯ However, in some other cases, controversial choices are irrational and are not expressions of our autonomy. Doctors should assist patients to make rational if individual choices. The patient also bears the responsibility for bringing his beliefs to the attention of the clinician.
-
The ethics of research, audit and publication have developed mainly within the last fifty years. The Declaration of Helsinki is the universally accepted code of conduct for researchers worldwide. All research has to be approved by an ethics committee, all of which are governed by a centralised structure which is the Central Office for Research Ethics Committees (COREC) in the UK. ⋯ Publication of results thought to be of lesser importance may prove difficult, however, and so there is a temptation to falsify or modify data to make it more attractive. This, together with other activities such as the fabrication of data, plagiarism, dual publication, salami publication, conflicts of interest and irregularities in authorship, have given Editors of journals a number of problems. Many of these issues around publication ethics may prove difficult to detect but the fear of sanctions from employers and professional organisations is a useful deterrent.
-
Intensive Care Medicine epitomises the difficulties inherent in modern medicine. In this chapter we examine some key medicolegal and ethical areas that are evolving. The principles of autonomy and consent are well established, but developments in UK caselaw have shown that the courts may be moving away from their traditional deference of the medical profession. We examine some recent cases and discuss the impact that these cases may have on practice in Intensive Care.
-
Public expectations of healthcare have changed dramatically over the last 10-20 years, particularly in relation to the involvement of patients in determining treatment options and the selection of the most appropriate treatment plan. Paternalistic actions of doctors, which involved telling the patient what treatment they were going to receive, without discussing risks and benefits of various options, are no longer acceptable. This has been reflected in decisions reached by the courts in cases in which patients have entered litigation on the basis that inadequate information was given to them before treatment, and that they were unaware of risks of complications which subsequently materialised. ⋯ Complaints about lack of information or inadequate consent can also result in a doctor being reported to regulatory authorities. It is therefore necessary for anaesthetists to be aware of current issues surrounding provision of information and obtaining consent for anaesthesia in various categories of patient. This article summarises these issues.