Journal of pain & palliative care pharmacotherapy
-
J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother · Sep 2021
Randomized Controlled TrialEconomic Impact of Preoperative Meloxicam IV Administration in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Trial Sub-Study.
We evaluated the economic impact associated with preoperative meloxicam IV 30 mg vs placebo administration among adult total knee arthroplasty (TKA) recipients enrolled in Phase IIIB NCT03434275 trial. Data on total hospital costs and length of stay (LOS) obtained from the trial were compared between meloxicam IV 30 mg and placebo groups. Patients in the meloxicam IV 30 mg vs placebo group (n = 93 vs 88) incurred an adjusted $2,266 (95% CI: -$1,035, $5,116; p = 0.1689) lower total hospital costs and an adjusted 8.6% (95% confidence interval [CI]: -2.0%, 18.1%; p = 0.1082) shorter LOS. While statistically non-significant, based on 95% CIs, the results from this sub-study may suggest a favorable impact associated with meloxicam IV 30 mg on hospital costs and LOS.
-
J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother · Sep 2021
Subcutaneous Patient-Controlled Analgesia in Palliative Care.
Subcutaneous patient-controlled analgesia (SCPCA) is an underutilized method of pain management in palliative care patients. In a select group of patients, including patients in whom enteral analgesia is ineffective or undeliverable, and in patients with limited access to healthcare due to geographical or other logistic issues, SCPCA can provide an effective and safe alternative.
-
J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother · Sep 2021
Case ReportsA Case Report of Phenobarbital for Proportionate Sedation to Control Refractory Symptoms at the End of Life in an Opioid Tolerant Patient.
End of life (EoL) and refractory symptom management is a growing clinical topic and there is minimal literature to support effective treatment strategies, especially in individuals with a substance use disorder or opioids and/or benzodiazepine tolerance. We report the successful use of phenobarbital for proportionate EoL sedation in a 57-year-old man with opioid use disorder (heroin) and metastatic urothelial carcinoma presenting to an acute care hospital with intractable back pain related to bone metastases. During his hospitalization, his daily opioid requirement exceeded 1 gram of morphine equivalent daily dose (MEDD) with suboptimal pain control. ⋯ After an acute medical decompensation, a goals of care discussion was held with his family and a determination with informed consent was made to change patient status to do not attempt resuscitation and proportionate sedation with phenobarbital was initiated to target refractory pain and agitation. Phenobarbital was continued for approximately 15 hours before patient peacefully died. Findings from this case report demonstrate the successful use of phenobarbital in opioid use disorder and benzodiazepine tolerance with intractable pain.
-
J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother · Jun 2021
ReviewThe Risk of QTc Prolongation with Antiemetics in the Palliative Care Setting: A Narrative Review.
Nausea and vomiting are common within the palliative care population. Antiemetic agents may help control symptoms, but may also place patients at risk for QTc prolongation. This article reviews pharmacotherapy agents including anticholinergics, antihistamines, antidopaminergics, 5-HT3 receptor antagonists, dronabinol, and medical marijuana and their associated risk of QTc prolongation. A clinical treatment pathway is provided to help guide clinicians in choosing the most appropriate antiemetic based upon patient specific factors for QTc prolongation.
-
J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother · Jun 2021
ReviewSubstance Abuse Risk and Medication Monitoring in Patients with Advanced Lung Cancer Receiving Palliative Care.
Oncology and Palliative Medicine lack guidance on routine opioid risk screening and compliance monitoring. This study explored relationships among risk screening and aberrant medication related behaviors in patients with advanced lung cancer receiving embedded palliative care. This was a single center, prospective study and data was collected from December 2018 to March 2020. ⋯ After pharmacist review, aberrant baseline UDS results were confirmed for 5/11 (45.5%) positive-risk and 4/23 (17.4%) negative-risk patients (p = 0.11). Overall, the SOAPP-R alone may be inadequate in this population and clinical pharmacists play an important role in comprehensive UDS result interpretation. Future studies are needed to validate this risk-screening tool in palliative cancer populations.