The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Comparative Study
The Discover artificial disc replacement versus fusion in cervical radiculopathy--a randomized controlled outcome trial with 2-year follow-up.
Several previous studies comparing artificial disc replacement (ADR) and fusion have been conducted with cautiously positive results in favor of ADR. This study is not, in contrast to most previous studies, an investigational device exemption study required by the Food and Drug Administration for approval to market the product in the United States. This study was partially funded with unrestricted institutional research grants by the company marketing the artificial disc used in this study. ⋯ Artificial disc replacement did not result in better outcome compared to fusion measured with NDI 2 years after surgery.
-
Review Meta Analysis Comparative Study
Comparative clinical effectiveness of management strategies for sciatica: systematic review and network meta-analyses.
There are numerous treatment approaches for sciatica. Previous systematic reviews have not compared all these strategies together. ⋯ For the first time, many different treatment strategies for sciatica have been compared in the same systematic review and meta-analysis. This approach has provided new data to assist shared decision-making. The findings support the effectiveness of nonopioid medication, epidural injections, and disc surgery. They also suggest that spinal manipulation, acupuncture, and experimental treatments, such as anti-inflammatory biological agents, may be considered. The findings do not provide support for the effectiveness of opioid analgesia, bed rest, exercise therapy, education/advice (when used alone), percutaneous discectomy, or traction. The issue of how best to estimate the effectiveness of treatment approaches according to their order within a sequential treatment pathway remains an important challenge.
-
A persistent challenge in spine surgery is improving screw fixation in patients with poor bone quality. Augmenting pedicle screw fixation with cement appears to be a promising approach. ⋯ Polymethylmethacrylate and various calcium ceramics appear promising for the augmentation of pedicle screw fixation biomechanically in both osteoporosis and revision spine surgery models. Further translational studies should be performed, and the results summarized in this review will need to be correlated with the clinical outcomes.
-
Despite the option to not answer, there is widespread anecdotal belief that the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) Section 8 (ODI-8/sex life) is answered inaccurately (ie, in relation to psychosocial factors, not pain) or that it repels ODI participation. Oswestry Disability Index versions have therefore been created that omit ODI-8; however, no evidence base justifies this. Interestingly, one recent study reported an ODI-8 response rate (RR) of 97%. ⋯ Contrary to previous findings, 47.69% of CLBP patients specifically ignored ODI-8; however, 100% completed the ODI remainder. Among "responders," ODI-8 was validated as having measured CLBP-mediated sexual inactivity. The ODI-8 was therefore treated consistently, as directed: It was either answered appropriately (ie, in relation to pain) or it was ignored (respecting the clause "if applicable"). No ODI modification therefore appears required for adults older than 18 years attending a multicultural Western CLBP clinic: One standard form including ODI-8 appears to yield appropriate ODI-8 response-treatment, with unaffected ODI participation. Multiple ODIs circumventing ODI-8 appear unnecessary and redundant in this population.
-
Although explored in humans and animal models, the pathomechanisms of discogenic low back pain (LBP) remain unknown. ⋯ To treat discogenic LBP, it is important to prevent sensitization of sensory nerve fibers innervating the IVD, to suppress pathogenic increases of cytokines, and to decrease disc hypermobility.