The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society
-
Introduced in 2007, the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ) has been widely used, but its psychometric properties have not been well studied. ⋯ The JOABPEQ domains are responsive measures in patients who undergo lumbar surgery. For physical function, the threshold for substantial clinically important differences was approximately 20 points for the JOABPEQ.
-
The Patient-Reported Outcomes Information System (PROMIS) instruments are an important advancement in the use of PROs, but need to be evaluated with longitudinal data to determine whether they are responsive to change in specific clinical populations. ⋯ This study demonstrates strong responsiveness of the PROMIS PF and PROMIS PI in a spine clinic population.
-
As increasing numbers of elderly Americans undergo spinal surgery, it is important to identify which patients are at highest risk for poor cognitive and functional recovery. Frailty is a geriatric syndrome that has been closely linked to poor outcomes, and short-form screening may be a helpful tool for preoperative identification of at-risk patients. ⋯ This pilot study demonstrates a trend toward poorer cognitive recovery 3 months following elective spinal surgery for frail patients. Frailty screening can help preoperatively identify patients who may experience protracted cognitive and functional recovery.
-
Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) parameters have been shown to be reliable and valid in patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD). Minimum clinically important difference (MCID) has become increasingly important to clinicians in evaluating patients with a threshold of improvement that is clinically relevant. ⋯ This study has demonstrated that MCID calculations for the HRQOL scales in ASD using LCA yield values comparable to other studies that had used different methodologies. The most important finding was the significantly different MCIDs for COMI, ODI, SF-36 PCS and SRS-22 in the surgically and nonsurgically treated cohorts. This finding suggests that a universal MCID value, inherent to a specific HRQOL for an entire cohort of ASD may not exist. Use of different MCIDs for surgical and nonsurgical patients may be warranted.
-
Comparative Study
Outcome and safety analysis of 3D-printed patient-specific pedicle screw jigs for complex spinal deformities: a comparative study.
Spinal deformities are very challenging to treat and have a great risk of neurologic complications because of hardware placement during corrective surgery. Various techniques have been introduced to ensure safe and accurate placement of pedicle screws. Patient-specific screw guides with predrawn and prevalidated trajectory seem to be an attractive option. ⋯ In our study, focusing on spinal deformities with statistically significant higher rates of accurate screw positioning and higher numbers of inserted screws with 3D printing was possible because of enhanced safety, particularly at apical levels. As such, spinal deformities are difficult to treat worldwide. In India, these deformities are often neglected and present at a very late and a much more deformed state when their treatment becomes even more challenging. Developing these patient-specific drill templates will enable an average spine surgeon to treat these patients with much ease and safety.