The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society
-
Despite rapidly increasing intervention, functional disability due to chronic low back pain (cLBP) has increased in recent decades. We often cannot identify mechanisms to explain the major negative impact cLBP has on patients' lives. Such cLBP is often termed non-specific and may be due to multiple biologic and behavioral etiologies. Researchers use varied inclusion criteria, definitions, baseline assessments, and outcome measures, which impede comparisons and consensus. Therefore, NIH Pain Consortium charged a Research Task Force (RTF) to draft standards for research on cLBP. The resulting multidisciplinary panel recommended using 2 questions to define cLBP; classifying cLBP by its impact (defined by pain intensity, pain interference, and physical function); use of a minimum dataset to describe research participants (drawing heavily on the PROMIS methodology); reporting "responder analyses" in addition to mean outcome scores; and suggestions for future research and dissemination. The Pain Consortium has approved the recommendations, which investigators should incorporate into NIH grant proposals. The RTF believes that these recommendations will advance the field, help to resolve controversies, and facilitate future research addressing the genomic, neurologic, and other mechanistic substrates of chronic low back pain. We expect that the RTF recommendations will become a dynamic document and undergo continual improvement. ⋯ A task force was convened by the NIH Pain Consortium with the goal of developing research standards for chronic low back pain. The results included recommendations for definitions, a minimum dataset, reporting outcomes, and future research. Greater consistency in reporting should facilitate comparisons among studies and the development of phenotypes.
-
In the context of shared decision-making, a valid estimation of the probability that a given patient will improve after a specific treatment is valuable. ⋯ A registry in routine practice can be used to develop models that estimate the probability of improvement for each individual patient undergoing a specific form of treatment. Generalizing this approach to other treatments can be valuable for shared decision making.
-
Total en bloc spondylectomy (TES) is a surgery designed to achieve complete resection of a malignant spinal tumor, such as spinal metastasis. Although this procedure decreases the rate of local recurrence, it is questionable whether local control prolongs a patient's survival. In cryosurgery, antitumor immunity is activated after percutaneous cryoablation of tumors. We applied this tumor-induced cryoimmunology to TES surgery and developed a "second-generation TES" that brings about TES enhancing antitumor immunity to prolong a patient's survival. ⋯ The second-generation TES using frozen tumor-bearing autograft inside a cage affords three benefits: (1) no pain at the bone harvest site, (2) shortening of operation time, and (3) decrease of blood loss. Moreover, our results show that second-generation TES provides not only a local radical cure but also a systemic immunological enhancement.
-
Intraoperative monitoring (IOM) using somatosensory-evoked potentials (SSEPs) plays an important role in reducing iatrogenic neurologic deficits during corrective pediatric idiopathic procedures for scoliosis. However, for unknown reasons, recent reports have cited that the sensitivity of SSEPs to detect neurologic deficits has decreased, in some to be less than 50%. This current trend, which is coincident with the addition of transcranial motor-evoked potentials, is surprising given that SSEPs are robust, reproducible responses that were previously shown to have sensitivity and specificity of >90%. ⋯ SSEP monitoring alone during idiopathic scoliosis continues to be a highly reliable method for the detection and prevention of iatrogenic injury. Our results confirm the high sensitivity and specificity of SSEP monitoring alone published in earlier literature. As such, we suggest the continued use of SSEP alone in idiopathic scoliosis surgeries. At this time we do not believe there are sufficient data to support the addition of MEP monitoring, although more studies and revised criteria for the use of MEP may provide added value for its use in the future.
-
Comparative Study
Interspinous device versus laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis: a comparative effectiveness study.
Currently no studies directly compare effectiveness between interspinous devices (IDs) and laminectomy in lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) patients. ⋯ Twelve-month reoperation rates and index hospitalization costs were significantly higher among patients who underwent ID compared with laminectomy for LSS.