The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society
-
Either an anterior approach or a posterior approach, which aims to decompress the spinal cord and restore the sagittal alignment, has been adopted to treat multilevel cervical degenerative myelopathy (CDM) associated with kyphosis. However, there is controversy on the optimal surgical strategy for the treatment of multilevel CDM with kyphotic deformity because of the complications of each surgical approach. ⋯ Enlarged laminectomy with fixation for the management of multilevel CDM is demonstrated to be an effective strategy for improving neurological function, restoring the normal cervical lordosis, and decreasing the incidence of axial symptoms and C5 root palsy, but there is a need for randomized controlled studies with long-term follow-up to confirm and clarify these results.
-
Iatrogenic dural tears are common complications encountered in spine surgery with known ramifications. There is little information, however, with respect to the implications and complications of traumatic dural tears. ⋯ Traumatic dural tears occurred in 11.6% of patients with operatively managed traumatic spine injuries at a regional Level 1 trauma center. In total, 83% had a neurologic injury and 49% had complete spinal cord injuries. Patients with traumatically induced dural tears have a low likelihood of developing a complication attributable to the dural tear.
-
Comparative Study
Degenerative lumbar scoliosis in elderly patients: dynamic stabilization without fusion versus posterior instrumented fusion.
Posterolateral fusion with pedicle screw instrumentation is currently the most widely accepted technique for degenerative lumbar scoliosis in elderly patients. However, a high incidence of complications has been reported in most series. Dynamic stabilization without fusion in patients older than 60 years has not previously been compared with the use of posterior fusion in degenerative lumbar scoliosis. ⋯ In elderly patients with degenerative lumbar scoliosis, pedicle screw-based dynamic stabilization was less invasive with shorter operative duration, less blood loss, and lower adverse event rates than instrumented posterior fusion. Scoliosis curve reduction and lumbar lordosis were superior after fusion; however, dynamic stabilization achieved satisfying values of both these parameters, and these results were stable after an average follow-up of more than 5 years. Furthermore, there was no difference between the two techniques in terms of functional clinical outcomes at the last follow-up.
-
Currently, pedicle screw segmental fixation of the spine is considered a standard of care for a number of conditions. Most surgeons employ a free-hand technique using various intraoperative modalities to improve pedicle screw accuracy. Despite continued improvements in technique, pedicle breach remains a frequent occurrence. Once a breach is detected intraoperatively, the most common corrective maneuver is to medially redirect the pedicle screw into the pedicle. To our knowledge, the biomechanical impact of medially redirecting a pedicle screw after a lateral pedicle breach has not been examined. ⋯ Compared with a CC lumbar pedicle screw, an RD lumbar pedicle screw placed after a lateral wall breach is significantly weaker in terms of maximal insertional torque, seating torque, screw loosening force, and axial pullout strength. These significant decreases in biomechanical properties are clearly important when RD pedicle screws are placed at the cephalad or caudal end of a long construct. In this situation, augmentation of the RD screw is an option.
-
Bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) were developed with the goal of improving clinical outcomes through the promotion of bony healing and reducing morbidity from iliac crest bone graft harvest. ⋯ There was an overall decrease in rates of revision fusion procedures from 2002 to 2008. Introduction of BMP did not correlate with decrease in use of autograft bone harvest. Use of BMP correlated with substantial increase in hospital charges. The small decrease in revision surgeries recorded, combined with lack of significant change in autograft harvest rates, may question the financial justification for the use of BMP.